Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Colm Fahy <C384-004@*******.UCD.IE>
Subject: Agrigen & proposal
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1993 16:49:36 GMT
Okay, I'm sure It's occurred to others but if anyones going to follow up the
nanites proposal for cybertech, then how about involving it with Agrigen's
current .heavy. search for data stolen from their system, which annoyed them so
much they shut it down! ... to me it has some potential?

Just A Thought



Colm (Vertical/Shades)

Also, sorry for not keeping the cast list up to date, I'll get around to it, I
swear
Message no. 2
From: The Powerhouse <P.C.Steele@*********.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Agrigen & proposal
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1993 17:02:51 GMT
> Okay, I'm sure It's occurred to others but if anyones going to follow up the
> nanites proposal for cybertech, then how about involving it with Agrigen's
> current .heavy. search for data stolen from their system, which annoyed them
so
> much they shut it down! ... to me it has some potential?

Agrigen unfortunately is not into any kind of cyberware (the development of).
They use some but merely for monitoring their subjects progress under various
new drugs etc. Essentially they are an argicultural research centre
specialising in gene splicing etc.. They use these talents to increase crop
yields and try and find ways of making cattle etc grow faster and bigger.

As to the system shut down well that was due to a massive invasion by some
smart frames. Who excatly was responsible for that we don't know yet, well
I and a couple of others do :)

Phill.
--
Phillip Steele - Email address P.C.Steele@***.ac.uk | An Uzi a day keeps the
Department Of Electrical & Electronic Engineering | politicians at bay O O
University Of Newcastle Upon Tyne, England | |
Land of the mad Geordies | The Powerhouse \_/

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Agrigen & proposal, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!