Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Brian E. Angliss" <ANGLISS@***.PSU.EDU>
Subject: Black IC and visibility
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 1994 14:12:28 -0500
Yep, I see it as highly visible too. That's half the point of the Encrypt that
Central sent Wizard-to scare off anyone before they mess with it. And I
didn't intend any of the people on the list to have been the flatlines. Just
stupid decker wannabe's who wouldn't have a chance against it and couldn't
recognize it for what it was.

As another note on the encryption. I posted it to get everyone involved that
I could as well as provide the background to the rest of the plotline, not to
start any arguments or anything. It is even likely that it didn't go via the
Shadowland hubs, but more or less directly to Wizard. But to show everyone
what was going on, I posted it so people would get involved. That's all.

Brian
Message no. 2
From: Randy Barron <rbarron@*****.CS.DU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Black IC and visibility
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 1994 12:28:29 -0700
t's oka, Brian. Read what I just said in a message entitled "Re: Black
encryptions....". It's bandwagonners that tend to either irk or amuse
me, dependant. [Dependant on what, noo one is really sure. =)]
Message no. 3
From: "Brian E. Angliss" <ANGLISS@***.PSU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Black IC and visibility
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 1994 16:12:44 -0500
Yep, I got it. Sorry if I seemed a little upset... Yep, it's pheremones.
Or more accurately the total lack thereof. Grrrr....

Brian
Message no. 4
From: Randy Barron <rbarron@*****.CS.DU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Black IC and visibility
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 1994 16:10:06 -0700
Awwwm, how cute, it's growling. =) Don't worry about it, stay that
way, then when I'm back into an argumentative mode I can have fun
with ya!

Silent Night

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Black IC and visibility, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.