Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Sascha Pabst <Sascha.Pabst@**********.UNI-OLDENBURG.DE>
Subject: Re: Yemen Sitaution
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 11:12:21 +0000
On 18 Nov 97 at 0:43, Paul J. Adam wrote:
[snip]
> We do _not_ abandon our POWs and WIAs.]<<<<<
> -- Lynch <00:43:25/11-18-58>
Query: Is WIA a typo, or do I need to know?

Sascha
--
+---___---------+----------------------------------------+--------------------+
| / / _______ | Jhary-a-Conel aka Sascha Pabst | 'If I'd had to buy |
| / /_/ ____/ |Sascha.Pabst@**********.Uni-Oldenburg.de| you, you wouldn't |
| \___ __/ | | be worth the |
|==== \_/ ======| *Wearing hats is just a way of life* | price.' |
|LOGOUT FASCISM!| - Me | - E.Weatherwax |
+------------- http://www.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de/~jhary ----(T.Pratchett)+
Message no. 2
From: Mark Imbriaco <mark@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Yemen Sitaution
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 08:56:10 -0800
>On 18 Nov 97 at 0:43, Paul J. Adam wrote:
>[snip]
>> We do _not_ abandon our POWs and WIAs.]<<<<<
>> -- Lynch <00:43:25/11-18-58>
>Query: Is WIA a typo, or do I need to know?

Wounded In Action.

-Mark
Message no. 3
From: Avenger <Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Yemen Sitaution
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 01:21:30 +0000
In article <m0xXkey-0004wgC@*******.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE>, Sascha
Pabst <Sascha.Pabst@**********.UNI-OLDENBURG.DE> waffled & burbled about
Yemen Sitaution
>On 18 Nov 97 at 0:43, Paul J. Adam wrote:
>[snip]
>> We do _not_ abandon our POWs and WIAs.]<<<<<
>> -- Lynch <00:43:25/11-18-58>
>Query: Is WIA a typo, or do I need to know?

Wounded in Action.


--
Dark Avenger -:- http://www.shalako.demon.co.uk -
Unofficial Shadowtk Newbies Guide, Edgerunners Datastore &
Beginnings of the Underseas Sourcebook.
http://freespace.virgin.net/pete.sims - Alternative UK Sourcebook (U/C)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Yemen Sitaution, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!