Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Mach mach@****.caltech.edu
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 16:01:08 -0700
Sorry for the public broadcast, but I think my last e-mail address that
I have for Brian Angliss is out of date and I was trying to get in
contact with him for a subplot I want to run soon that could involve
everybody's favorite Cyber-doc/vampire/arms-dealer: Action Jackson.

So Brian, if you are still getting PlotD, and have a spare minute or two
lying around, let me know. If someone else knows that he's no longer on
plotD but still is part of STk, and has his newest e-mail address, could
you pass it on to me?

--Catch you later

Jeff
Message no. 2
From: Logan Graves logan1@*****.intercom.net
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 19:49:35 -0400
In our last (behind the scenes) episode, Mach wrote:

<snip>
>
> If someone else knows that he's no longer on plotD but still is part of STk,
> and has his newest e-mail address, could you pass it on to me?

Not to cut on Mach (or anyone else present--obviously) ...

But why in Bob's name would anyone writing on ShadowTK _NOT_ be subscribed to
PlotD?! Shouldn't that be a prerequisite or "required reading" or something?

IIRC, Mark sub'd everyone from the old iTribe TK list to this one during the
big move to JackPoint.

--Logan
______________________________________________________logan1@*****.intercom.net
(>) Is it in the "mysterious employer credo" that
these little rendezvous always have to be in exotic
locales? I mean, just *once* wouldn't you like to
sit down at a Denny's and plan an assassination over
a "French Slam" breakfast?
(>) Deadpool, merc-with-a-mouth
Message no. 3
From: Mark Imbriaco mark.imbriaco@*****.com
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 20:56:16 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Logan Graves wrote:

> IIRC, Mark sub'd everyone from the old iTribe TK list to this one during the
> big move to JackPoint.

I'm pretty sure you recall correctly. It is not, however, a pre-requisite
for being on TK. It'd be somewhat inconvenient for people who are only
interested in lurking and reading TK if we forced them to get Plot-D as
well, so I don't suppose we should force it.

If someone is actively posting to the list however, I wholeheartedly
agree with you that they should almost certainly be subscribed to Plot-D.

-Mark

--
"The big question is whether the planet will disappear in the twinkling of
an eye. It is astonishingly unlikely that there is any risk - but I could
not prove it." - John Nelson
Message no. 4
From: Brian Angliss angliss@********.att.net
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 21:31:28 -0600
I'm still around. FYI, my new email address is angliss@***.net. And I'm
interested.

Brian

Mach wrote:

> Sorry for the public broadcast, but I think my last e-mail address that
> I have for Brian Angliss is out of date and I was trying to get in
> contact with him for a subplot I want to run soon that could involve
> everybody's favorite Cyber-doc/vampire/arms-dealer: Action Jackson.
>
> So Brian, if you are still getting PlotD, and have a spare minute or two
> lying around, let me know. If someone else knows that he's no longer on
> plotD but still is part of STk, and has his newest e-mail address, could
> you pass it on to me?
>
> --Catch you later
>
> Jeff
Message no. 5
From: Mach mach@****.caltech.edu
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 14:57:07 -0700
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Logan Graves wrote:

> > If someone else knows that he's no longer on plotD but still is part of STk,
> > and has his newest e-mail address, could you pass it on to me?
>
> Not to cut on Mach (or anyone else present--obviously) ...
>
> But why in Bob's name would anyone writing on ShadowTK _NOT_ be subscribed to
> PlotD?! Shouldn't that be a prerequisite or "required reading" or
something?

As I think someone else addressed slightly: If you are _writing_ on
ShadowTk, then yes, PlotD is well-nigh (as in not, but you should feel
as though it is) mandatory reading. However, since due to time
conflicts, etc. some people go on extended hiatus now and then, it isn't
unreasonable for them to unsub from plotD for the time being, since it
can often have more messages going through it than the main list.
Since I didn't remember seeing something from Mr. Angliss in a while, I
didn't know if he was lurking or not. Thankfully he isn't and I'll
"conduct business" with him off-channel. (I never wish to spoil a
plotline for the readers on plotd if it doesn't need to be. =) )

--My two yen

Jeff
Message no. 6
From: Mach mach@****.caltech.edu
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 16:01:08 -0700
Sorry for the public broadcast, but I think my last e-mail address that
I have for Brian Angliss is out of date and I was trying to get in
contact with him for a subplot I want to run soon that could involve
everybody's favorite Cyber-doc/vampire/arms-dealer: Action Jackson.

So Brian, if you are still getting PlotD, and have a spare minute or two
lying around, let me know. If someone else knows that he's no longer on
plotD but still is part of STk, and has his newest e-mail address, could
you pass it on to me?

--Catch you later

Jeff
Message no. 7
From: Logan Graves logan1@*****.intercom.net
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 19:49:35 -0400
In our last (behind the scenes) episode, Mach wrote:

<snip>
>
> If someone else knows that he's no longer on plotD but still is part of STk,
> and has his newest e-mail address, could you pass it on to me?

Not to cut on Mach (or anyone else present--obviously) ...

But why in Bob's name would anyone writing on ShadowTK _NOT_ be subscribed to
PlotD?! Shouldn't that be a prerequisite or "required reading" or something?

IIRC, Mark sub'd everyone from the old iTribe TK list to this one during the
big move to JackPoint.

--Logan
______________________________________________________logan1@*****.intercom.net
(>) Is it in the "mysterious employer credo" that
these little rendezvous always have to be in exotic
locales? I mean, just *once* wouldn't you like to
sit down at a Denny's and plan an assassination over
a "French Slam" breakfast?
(>) Deadpool, merc-with-a-mouth
Message no. 8
From: Mark Imbriaco mark.imbriaco@*****.com
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 20:56:16 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Logan Graves wrote:

> IIRC, Mark sub'd everyone from the old iTribe TK list to this one during the
> big move to JackPoint.

I'm pretty sure you recall correctly. It is not, however, a pre-requisite
for being on TK. It'd be somewhat inconvenient for people who are only
interested in lurking and reading TK if we forced them to get Plot-D as
well, so I don't suppose we should force it.

If someone is actively posting to the list however, I wholeheartedly
agree with you that they should almost certainly be subscribed to Plot-D.

-Mark

--
"The big question is whether the planet will disappear in the twinkling of
an eye. It is astonishingly unlikely that there is any risk - but I could
not prove it." - John Nelson
Message no. 9
From: Brian Angliss angliss@********.att.net
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 21:31:28 -0600
I'm still around. FYI, my new email address is angliss@***.net. And I'm
interested.

Brian

Mach wrote:

> Sorry for the public broadcast, but I think my last e-mail address that
> I have for Brian Angliss is out of date and I was trying to get in
> contact with him for a subplot I want to run soon that could involve
> everybody's favorite Cyber-doc/vampire/arms-dealer: Action Jackson.
>
> So Brian, if you are still getting PlotD, and have a spare minute or two
> lying around, let me know. If someone else knows that he's no longer on
> plotD but still is part of STk, and has his newest e-mail address, could
> you pass it on to me?
>
> --Catch you later
>
> Jeff
Message no. 10
From: Mach mach@****.caltech.edu
Subject: A.J. / Brian Angliss?
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 14:57:07 -0700
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Logan Graves wrote:

> > If someone else knows that he's no longer on plotD but still is part of STk,
> > and has his newest e-mail address, could you pass it on to me?
>
> Not to cut on Mach (or anyone else present--obviously) ...
>
> But why in Bob's name would anyone writing on ShadowTK _NOT_ be subscribed to
> PlotD?! Shouldn't that be a prerequisite or "required reading" or
something?

As I think someone else addressed slightly: If you are _writing_ on
ShadowTk, then yes, PlotD is well-nigh (as in not, but you should feel
as though it is) mandatory reading. However, since due to time
conflicts, etc. some people go on extended hiatus now and then, it isn't
unreasonable for them to unsub from plotD for the time being, since it
can often have more messages going through it than the main list.
Since I didn't remember seeing something from Mr. Angliss in a while, I
didn't know if he was lurking or not. Thankfully he isn't and I'll
"conduct business" with him off-channel. (I never wish to spoil a
plotline for the readers on plotd if it doesn't need to be. =) )

--My two yen

Jeff

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about A.J. / Brian Angliss?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!