Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Avenger <Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Artillery in city limits
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 01:29:25 +0100
Hehe... Oh boy are the press going to have a field day with that one...

I wonder if the insurance on the supermarket covers howitzers? <g>

--
Avenger
Message no. 2
From: "Paul J. Adam" <shadowtk@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Artillery in city limits
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 09:09:43 +0100
In message <eXd0xmAl5SQ1EwuM@*******.demon.co.uk>, Avenger
<Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK> writes
>Hehe... Oh boy are the press going to have a field day with that one...

The CoT terrorists had been storing explosives and they went off, or
were detonated in a suicide bid. Anything else is irresponsible media
speculation. As if Federal officers would use field artillery against
terrorists! The very thought.

Quinn wants there to be lots of speculation, of course...

>I wonder if the insurance on the supermarket covers howitzers? <g>

Hadn't been paid in years, so no claim... one of the drawbacks of basing
in somewhere fairly empty like Puyallup is that - although there aref
few prying eyes to sell you out - there are also few innocent bystanders
around to inhibit this sort of response.

The classic dilemna of building a headquarters: camouflage it and it's
easily infiltrated, fortify it and it's a big shiny target.
Message no. 3
From: Avenger <Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Artillery in city limits
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 11:50:26 +0100
In article <TWMBMEAHpZQ1Ewf0@********.demon.co.uk>, Paul J. Adam
<shadowtk@********.DEMON.CO.UK> waffled & burbled about Artillery in
city limits
>In message <eXd0xmAl5SQ1EwuM@*******.demon.co.uk>, Avenger
><Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK> writes
>>Hehe... Oh boy are the press going to have a field day with that one...
>
>The CoT terrorists had been storing explosives and they went off, or
>were detonated in a suicide bid. Anything else is irresponsible media
>speculation. As if Federal officers would use field artillery against
>terrorists! The very thought.

Snigger - exactly, but there are always conspiracists, experts,
eyewitnesses (or should that be "earwitnesses")? Of course the building
detonated, I mean who /would/ use artillery in city limits - but ther's
a lot of people somewhere who heard the volley, more who heard the train
of shells, and still more who would recognise it...

>Quinn wants there to be lots of speculation, of course...

Conspiracy, speculation, accusation, theories, evidence and looneys
claiming the wrath of God was delivered in a UFO. :)

>The classic dilemna of building a headquarters: camouflage it and it's
>easily infiltrated, fortify it and it's a big shiny target.

Ah, sorry, I didn't get the impression that's what it was from the post
- must have missed the reference.

--
Avenger

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!