Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Chuck McKenzie <kilroy@**.WISC.EDU>
Subject: Black Knight
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 13:12:59 -0600
I'm assuming that the current Black Knight posting on the list isn't the
Black Knight that was recently taken down. I'm also assuming that he
isn't one of the Chess Men. Has someone had a talk with him?

Chuck McKenzie kilroy@***.cs.wisc.edu
http://www.upl.cs.wisc.edu/~kilroy/ charlesm@**.wisc.edu
This space for rent.
Message no. 2
From: Black Knight <bludhawk@**.NET>
Subject: Re: Black Knight
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 14:54:44 -0600
nChuck McKenzie wrote:
>
> I'm assuming that the current Black Knight posting on the list isn't the
> Black Knight that was recently taken down. I'm also assuming that he
> isn't one of the Chess Men. Has someone had a talk with him?


No I'm not the same. Never herd of the prior one before.

How did he buy the farm, anyway?

Black Knight
Message no. 3
From: Mike Goldberg <michael.goldberg@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Black Knight
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 12:27:31 MST
I don't have a problem with whoever is using the Black Knight handle.
The person might want to add something to it to not indicate that it
isn't the original.

At one point, we had three different Raven's on shadowtk.

For the record, the original Black Knight is unlikely to be posting in
the next few months at the very least.

M.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Black Knight
Author: ShadowTk Plot and Administrative Discussion
<PLOTD@********.ITRIBE.NET> at SMTP-PO
Date: 12/23/96 12:20 PM


I'm assuming that the current Black Knight posting on the list isn't the
Black Knight that was recently taken down. I'm also assuming that he
isn't one of the Chess Men. Has someone had a talk with him?

Chuck McKenzie kilroy@***.cs.wisc.edu
http://www.upl.cs.wisc.edu/~kilroy/ charlesm@**.wisc.edu
This space for rent.
Message no. 4
From: Black Knight <bludhawk@**.NET>
Subject: Re: Black Knight
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 15:14:16 -0600
If I'm causing a stir with this name. Than I'll change it. I didn't know
that it was already being used. Sorry for the problem.
Message no. 5
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Black Knight
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 21:58:56 -0500
At 01:12 PM 12/23/96 -0600, you wrote:
>I'm assuming that the current Black Knight posting on the list isn't the
>Black Knight that was recently taken down. I'm also assuming that he
>isn't one of the Chess Men. Has someone had a talk with him?
>
Well, he's not one of the Chess Boyz... We refrained from using a Black
knight because tehre was already one on here...

Steve
Message no. 6
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Black Knight
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 02:54:42 +0000
|
|At 01:12 PM 12/23/96 -0600, you wrote:
|>I'm assuming that the current Black Knight posting on the list isn't the
|>Black Knight that was recently taken down. I'm also assuming that he
|>isn't one of the Chess Men. Has someone had a talk with him?
|>
|Well, he's not one of the Chess Boyz... We refrained from using a Black
|knight because tehre was already one on here...

That's right....
We changed his name to Black Horsey thing....

Hehehehe.....

Hey, it's late, OK....

--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell | |
|Principal subjects in:- | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! >*SULK*<|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Black Knight, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!