Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Sascha Pabst <Sascha.Pabst@**********.UNI-OLDENBURG.DE>
Subject: Bogie in the air
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 16:42:07 +0000
On 5 Jan 97 at 23:57, Chuck McKenzie wrote:
[snip]
> *****Internal: SEATAC Air command
[snip]
> -- SEATAC 2 <23:52:02/01-05-58>
>
> *****Internal: SEATAC Air command
[snip]
> +++++Pause: 3 minutes
[snip]
> -- Lt. K. Hellerstein <23:33:21/01-05-58>
> SEATAC Air command
Please watch the times. Especially when cut&pasting from previous
messages :-) (Yup, I know the problems, too :-)

Plus, as it has been pointed out to us (the IF team), action happening
so fast is not normally piped through a computer system, but most
probably via radio.

Well, just my thoughts...
Sascha
--
+---___---------+----------------------------------------+--------------------+
| / / _______ | Jhary-a-Conel aka Sascha Pabst | 'Hate is a force of|
| / /_/ ____/ |Sascha.Pabst@**********.Uni-Oldenburg.de| attraction. Hate is|
| \___ __/ | | just love with its|
|==== \_/ ======| *Wearing hats is just a way of life* |back turned' - Terry|
|LOGOUT FASCISM!| - Me |Pratchett-Masquerade|
+------------- http://www.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de/~jhary -----------------+
Message no. 2
From: Chuck McKenzie <kilroy@**.WISC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Bogie in the air
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 11:33:49 -0600
On Mon, 6 Jan 1997, Sascha Pabst wrote:

> Please watch the times. Especially when cut&pasting from previous
> messages :-) (Yup, I know the problems, too :-)

Bingo. I noticed just after I sent it.

> Plus, as it has been pointed out to us (the IF team), action happening
> so fast is not normally piped through a computer system, but most
> probably via radio.

That also. I was a bit tired, and once I got up to about 4 messages I
realized I was doing it wrong.

Chuck McKenzie kilroy@***.cs.wisc.edu
http://www.upl.cs.wisc.edu/~kilroy/ charlesm@**.wisc.edu
Please disregard this message.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!