Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Brad Shantz <bshantz@****.COM>
Subject: Friday the 13th
Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 12:11:31 PDT
Has anyone checked if May 2055 has a Friday the 13th. If it doesn't, Tim's
posts are wrong. (Just an observation)

:::::::::::::::::<<< NETWORKING THE DESKTOP >>>:::::::::::::::::
Brad Shantz Internet : bshantz@****.com
SPRY Inc Ph# (206) 447-0300
316 Occidental Avenue S. 2nd Floor FAX (206) 447-9008
Seattle, WA 98104
----------------------------------------------------------------
"In gopherspace no one can hear you scream."
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Message no. 2
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: Friday the 13th
Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 15:01:26 -0500
ERROR: This message seems to be empty. It is located at LOG9405B.PLO::95688,261.
Message no. 3
From: Tim Skirvin <tskirvin@********.UNI.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Friday the 13th
Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 16:46:59 -0500
Who cares. We've gone on about days of the week being the same for a
LONG time now, I think we might as well continue...

<In other words, if the continuity is screwed up, we can make sure it
will CONTINUE to be screwed up.>

If anyone wants to look it up, though, remember that leap years are
screwed up in the new century...

-------------Tim Skirvin (tskirvin@********.uni.uiuc.edu-------------
"He's NOT a gibbering idiot - he's cured of gibbering, he's just an
idiot now." -- Jane, "Waiting for God"
Message no. 4
From: Tim Skirvin <tskirvin@********.UNI.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Friday the 13th
Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 16:48:17 -0500
> May 2055

Ah well. So I was wrong. As I said, we've been using days of the week
as they are right now anyway for the last LONG time...

-------------Tim Skirvin (tskirvin@********.uni.uiuc.edu-------------
"He's NOT a gibbering idiot - he's cured of gibbering, he's just an
idiot now." -- Jane, "Waiting for God"

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.