Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Avenger <Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Justifying Achilles
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 11:42:50 +0000
Once Paul has posted the Achilles speech, there's likely to be a couple
of questions regarding the "mission statement" of this FBI branch.

The general idea and concept for this came from the US House Judiciary
Committee on Terrorism (1995)

Following are highlights from this which initially gave me the idea.
Items which were under consideration for inclusion in the committee's
legislation. (From US Judiciary Homepage - linked from FBI/CIA sites)

Turning terrorism into the Shadows is not that much of a leap in
imagination IMO. In talking to Paul about Achilles, we decided to go
for a more militant and activist section rather than the more usual
judicial process which would not be as interesting to read or for us to
run. (Who wants to read endless legalese - I sure don't want to write
it <g>)
Achilles still answer to the law, but we're trying to design a certain
amount of freedom within that law to deal with the anarchy inherent in
Shadowrun. :) Don't worry, it doesn't mean that the FBI are going to be
investigating _every_ incident on the list, they're going to be far too
busy for that. :)

Any ideas and thoughts on how others see these sorts of organisations
are encouraged and welcomed.

-----

New restrictions on the granting of U.S. visas to aliens linked to
terrorist activities, and provisions to curb the fraudulent manipulation
of lax U.S. immigration laws including the political asylum process.

Remove restrictions currently imposed on the Automated Visa Lookout
Systems, an information database that helps identify aliens seeking
admission to the U.S. and who have links to terrorist organizations, as
well as locate foreign nationals living in the U.S. whose vias have
expired.

Encourage closer cooperation between intelligence services and
immigration officials, particularly with the State Department's consular
offices worldwide, to weed out potential domestic terrorist threats.

Authorize additional monies in the FBI budget to ensure adequate funding
for anti-terrorism measures.

Establish expedited deportation proceedings against aliens living in the
United States and engaged in terrorist activities; sanction greater
scrutiny of domestic fundraising activities on behalf of groups with
links to international terrorism.

Further restrict the use, purchase, sale and transfer of nuclear
materials, plastic explosives and toxic gases, including implementation
of the Montreal convention on the marking of plastic explosives.

Encourage broader disclosure by consumer reporting agencies to the FBI
for counterintelligence and counter terrorism investigations.

Provide funding for implementation of the Digital Telephony legislation,
which was enacted in 1994. This law requires telecommunications
companies in the U.S. to meet law enforcement electronic assistance
requirements. An estimated $500 million is needed in the next five years
to implement the program.

Enable the FBI greater access to hotel/motel records for the purpose of
identifyng subjects of terrorism investigations.

Enhance the ability of the FBI to monitor domestic organizations that
have known terrorist leanings.


--
Dark Avenger -:- http://www.shalako.demon.co.uk/index.htm -
Unofficial Shadowtk Newbies Guide, Edgerunners Datastore &
Beginnings of the Underseas Sourcebook.
http://freespace.virgin.net/pete.sims/index.htm - Alternative UK Sourcebook
(U/C)
Message no. 2
From: Kristling Ravenwing <kristling@*******.CROSSWINDS.NET>
Subject: Re: Justifying Achilles
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 00:09:54 -0500
Oh! OH! can Kristling be one of the people you interagate? He hasn't really
done anything, but his compatriot Dexter has done a few things that may be
"misconstrued" as terrorist actions. Kristling'd be easier to grab, he's
still got a SIN. The ID was, oddly enough, given to him by the FBI after he
went out of his way to help them catch a terrorist bomber.
>>>>>["But officer! The mist spirit was beating this man up when I got
here!"
Reach me at kravenwing@*******.crosswinds.net
ICQ UIN: 6642462
www.crosswind.com/toronto/~kristling/ should soon hold my webpage.]<<<<<
--Kristling (the Weird) Ravenwing </>
Message no. 3
From: Avenger <Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Justifying Achilles
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 06:17:58 +0000
In article <199801070518.AAA29220@***.crosswinds.net>, Kristling
Ravenwing <kristling@*******.CROSSWINDS.NET> waffled & burbled about
Justifying Achilles
>Oh! OH! can Kristling be one of the people you interagate? He hasn't really
>done anything, but his compatriot Dexter has done a few things that may be
>"misconstrued" as terrorist actions. Kristling'd be easier to grab, he's
>still got a SIN. The ID was, oddly enough, given to him by the FBI after he
>went out of his way to help them catch a terrorist bomber.
>>>>>>["But officer! The mist spirit was beating this man up when I
got
>here!"

ROTFLOMAO

Oh that's great. I'm sorry, but Kristling really wouldn't enjoy being
interrogated by Achilles. Believe me. If you have access to the Lone
Star Sourcebook, you might want to have a browse through it. If he's
caught by Achilles he's in deep doodoo, and been a very very bad person.
One day Achilles might hunt him. At the moment, they're undergoing
training with the new equipment at Fort Lewis, and consolidating their
offices and mission. It'll be a little while before they're fully
operational. Quite honestly, you'd be better off taken in by SIGA, who
are active at the moment. They'd be _much_ more reasonable. :)

Just kick Lynch in the nuts when you see him, and whatever he does, will
be 15% of what you'd get at the hands of Achilles.

Or you could always turn yourself in to FBI headquarters in Seneca
street. :)

Have yourself an interrogation. Seneca are daft enough to ask just
about anything, including whether you knew the burger you bought at
lunch was purchased from an illegal alien dealing in secret documents
about a new ice cream...

--
Dark Avenger -:- http://www.shalako.demon.co.uk/index.htm -
Unofficial Shadowtk Newbies Guide, Edgerunners Datastore &
Beginnings of the Underseas Sourcebook.
http://freespace.virgin.net/pete.sims/index.htm - Alternative UK Sourcebook
(U/C)
Message no. 4
From: Kristling Ravenwing <kristling@*******.CROSSWINDS.NET>
Subject: Re: Justifying Achilles
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 05:10:36 -0500
> ROTFLOMAO
>
> Oh that's great. I'm sorry, but Kristling really wouldn't enjoy being
> interrogated by Achilles. Believe me. If you have access to the Lone
> Star Sourcebook, you might want to have a browse through it. If he's
> caught by Achilles he's in deep doodoo, and been a very very bad person.
> One day Achilles might hunt him. At the moment, they're undergoing
> training with the new equipment at Fort Lewis, and consolidating their
> offices and mission. It'll be a little while before they're fully
> operational. Quite honestly, you'd be better off taken in by SIGA, who
> are active at the moment. They'd be _much_ more reasonable. :)
Sigh.... I just HATE not being able to get the source books, so much goes
over my head....

>
> Just kick Lynch in the nuts when you see him, and whatever he does, will
> be 15% of what you'd get at the hands of Achilles.
Noooo, I think I rather stay on the Lynch's good side....
>
> Or you could always turn yourself in to FBI headquarters in Seneca
> street. :)
>
> Have yourself an interrogation. Seneca are daft enough to ask just
> about anything, including whether you knew the burger you bought at
> lunch was purchased from an illegal alien dealing in secret documents
> about a new ice cream...
Hmmmmm......... give me a day......:)

But honestly, I need some storyline ideas. I want to be more then a lurker
here.

>>>>>["Oh, look. I never thought a phoenix would do "THAT"
to the hell
hound..."
Reach me at kravenwing@*******.crosswinds.net
ICQ UIN: 6642462
www.crosswind.com/toronto/~kristling/ should soon hold my webpage.]<<<<<
--Kristling (the Weird) Ravenwing </>
Message no. 5
From: Avenger <Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Justifying Achilles
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 11:50:42 +0000
Further to the comments made by Belial concerning the "Police State" and
"Federal Death Squad" remarks. I want to share with the list a document
that inspired some of his strange behaviour and comments.

Aside from his apparent interest in the presence of Lillith amongst a
Federal Agency, some of his points, although the words of a paranoid
cosnpiracy nut, are based in current speculation and fact.

Follows is the short document that gave me the idea for his ranting, and
may affect how Achilles develops further.

Discussion is of course encouraged, if the list feels that this might be
relevant to the world of Shadowrun and Shadowtk.

I'm curious quite frankly how people here see law enforcement of 205*,
ignoring temporarily the unique situation of Seattle being under the
dominion of a corporate force. One I personally feel would still employ
a considerable number of the original Seattle PD.



SWAT: IS IT BEING USED TOO MUCH?
By Steve Macko, ERRI Crime Analyst

There is a growing controversy within law enforcement circles about the
increasing use of police Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams and
how they should be employed. Surveys, that we will detail in this
report, are showing that most of the work being done by SWAT teams today
is not the traditional hostage-situations or barricaded subjects, but
rather high-risk warrant work and street gang suppression.

Many people, mostly academics, argue that the increased use of these
speciality units could erode the perception of the public as the police
being public servants and more like an occupying army. ERRI analysts
have looked at both sides of the argument and are unable to come to any
conclusive determination. ERRI essentially feels that both sides of the
controversy have valid and correct points.

On one hand, police are coming more and more in contact with heavily-
armed individuals. Many subjects, such as street gang members and drug
dealers, have automatic military-type weapons. Police officers need to
counter that to protect themselves and the public.

On the other hand, the wearing of fatigues, buzz hair cuts, body armor
and carrying H&K MP-5's on patrol will send a message to the criminal
and the law-abiding citizen. Community relations and perceptions must be
taken into account for a police force to be truly effective. A police
department cannot afford to lose the confidence and cooperation of the
community.

In this report, we will examine the Fresno, California, Police
Department. Until 1994, Fresno had a traditional SWAT team that was only
used for the traditional SWAT team responses. Today, the unit is called
the Violent Crime Suppression Unit. In late 1994, Fresno experienced a
crime wave. In the city of about 400,000 people, there were 55 shootings
in five months that resulted in the death of 13 people, including three
innocent children. That's when Fresno's SWAT team went into the streets
on constant patrol.

The police chief credits the unit for partly reducing violent crime in
Fresno by 8.7 percent in 1995 and 3.5 percent in 1996. Currently, the
unit is only being used during night patrol. The program is planned to
be expanded to daytime patrol. The Fresno Police Department also employs
the use of a helicopter and will soon have an armored personnel carrier.

Fresno's SWAT team is by no means unique. In fact, it is said to only be
mirroring what is a growing trend in United States law enforcement.
Surveys indicate a rapid expansion of SWAT team activities.

There have been complaints that the officers used on street patrol in
these speciality units are too aggressive, too heavily armed and too
scary to the general public.

Joseph McNamara is the former police chief of San Jose and Kansas City.
Today, he is part of the Hoover Institute at Stanford University. He
said, "It's a very dangerous thing when you're telling cops they're
soldiers and there's an enemy out there. I don't like it all."

Police researcher Peter Kraska, a professor of police studies at Western
Kentucky University said that a new study has documented an explosive
growth in police SWAT teams. In a nationwide survey of 690 law
enforcement agencies serving cities with populations of 50,000 or more,
it was found that 90 percent of the departments now have an active SWAT
team. That is compared to 60 percent in the 1980s.

The survey also showed that even rural and small communities -- two out
of three agencies -- have a SWAT team. Kraska calls this phenomena the
"militarizing of Mayberry."

Accrding to Kraska, what's even more important than the actual number of
teams is how their mission has been expanded. SWAT teams are said to be
increasingly involved in more standard police work. The teams are now
heavily involved in high risk warrant work -- mostly related to the war
on drugs -- and by extension, they are also heavily into gang
suppression.

Kraska said, "Where the SWAT teams were once deployed a few times a
year, they are now used for all kinds of police work -- dozens of calls,
hundreds of calls a year. In SWAT units formed since 1980, their use has
increased by 538 percent." And as mentioned before, in the case of
Fresno, are deployed as roaming patrols.

The Fresno Violent Crime Suppression Unit currently has 30 members. They
patrol high-crime neighborhoods, serve warrants, stop vehicles,
interrogate gangbangers and, essentially, show a presence -- which is
very important in police work. The officers of the Fresno unit wear what
is called subdued gray-and-black urban camouflage and body armor.

In Chicago, a unit of this type is called a tactical or a gang crimes
unit. Officers in these units, make up the bulk of the Chicago Police
Department Hostage-Barricade-Terrorism (HBT) team. Tactical officers, in
Chicago, have always been known for their aggressiveness.

As mentioned before, the increased use of these teams is drawing some
fire from law enforcement experts. Police officials defend the SWAT
teams use as being necessary to help fight crime. Who is right and who
is wrong? Both sides have convincing arguments.

Ed Winchester, the police chief of Fresno, defends his use of the SWAT
team by saying that criminals are more heavily armed and more violent
and these types of individuals require a more extreme response.

Winchester told the story of why Fresno even formed a SWAT team in 1973
to begin with. It was created after an officer was fatally shot by a
robbery suspect following what he called a chaotic police response where
Fresno officers fired hundreds of rounds at the suspect, even borrowed
the use of an armored car and fired tear gas which, in turn, affected
the people in the surrounding neighborhood.

The chief said, "It was what we would call a fiasco." It was at that
time, the upper echelon of the department decided that a more highly-
trained, specialized and disciplined unit was needed and it was
patterned after the Los Angeles Police Department SWAT team, which had
been in use for about ten years before 1973.

Fresno's SWAT team responded to only very specific incidents, such as
barricaded subjects, from 1973 to 1994. Winchester said after he
deployed the team to street patrol, "The criminals aren't stupid. They
see eight guys surrounding them, all carrying automatic weapons and
wearing black fatigues, they don't want to get killed."

In 1995, C.D. Smith, a member of the Fresno PD SWAT team, wrote in a
police magazine: "The streets of Fresno have become a war zone for cops,
who find themselves in the heat of battle with the bad guys at least
once a month."

Winchester said about the use of his SWAT team, "Is there a downside?
Sure there is. It's a sad commentary -- sad when crime is so bad you got
to put a SWAT unit on the street."

Critics say that the growing use of paramilitary-style police units will
threaten the idea of a civilian police force. It was thought that the
growing trend was in "community policing," where beat officers on the
street had more interaction with the community to encourage the
population to work with the police to solve community problems as well
as crime. To enlist the community to work with the police.

Stanford's McNamara said, "Despite the conventional wisdom that
community policing is sweeping the nation, the exact opposite is
happening. The police and their communities ought to think seriously
about this. Is there a need for SWAT teams? Yes, for highly specialized
functions. But the police love these units, and this is a disastrous
image to project."

McNamara and other law enforcement experts believe that the positive
impact of the SWAT teams in reducing crime is, at most, short-lived.
That's because the pressure must always be maintained by these units.
The greatest fear is that heavily-armed, commando-style police will
eventually be seen and perceived as an occupying army.

Professor Kraska said, "The drug war created the atmosphere for this
kind of pro-active policing. We have never seen this kind of policing,
where SWAT teams routinely break through a door, subdue all the
occupants and search the premises for drugs, cash and weapons."

Kraska's research showed that between 1980 and 1995, SWAT teams were
employed 1.3 percent of the time in riot situations, 3.6 percent of the
time in hostage-situations and 13.4 percent of the time for barricaded
subjects. About 75 percent of their mission now is devoted to serve
high- risk warrants, mostly in drug raids.

The practice is defended by police chiefs and SWAT officers by saying
that gangs and drug dealers are using more powerful weapons and the
warrant work should be done by highly-trained and armed officers. Chief
Winchester said that because of their training, SWAT team officers
actually fire fewer shots. He said, "They overwhelm suspects. They don't
need to shoot."

Professor Kraska's survey also found out that many police SWAT teams are
being instructed by active and retired U.S. military experts in special
operations. They also receive training from the FBI, the Federal Law
Enforcement Training Center and the National Tactical Officers
Association.

They also receiving training from private companies. One of the more
popular, private courses is offered by Heckler and Koch. The executive
director of the National Tactical Officers Association is Larry Glick.
He said that some of the private training seminars are taught by
"retired military personnel who don't know what they're doing." He added
that the training offered by Heckler and Koch is "very successful and
credible, among the best." But it should be remembered that "their
ultimate goal is to sell their guns."

Kraska and other law enforcement experts say that the new weaponry and
paramilitary-style tactics being employed by SWAT units is attracting a
different kind of officer -- less the cop as a social worker and more
the cop as an elite special operations soldier.

It is ERRI's opinion that both types of officer are needed in today's
world on the street. It will be up to the superiors of these officers to
determine where and when to use both types of cops. There is probably
room for both. But putting the wrong type of officer in the wrong type
of situation will undoubtedly result in problems.
Message no. 6
From: Jaimie Nicholson <jaimie.nicholson@********.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Subject: Re: Justifying Achilles
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 12:14:58 +1300
That'll learn you to put the right to bear arms in your constitution. :P :b
:P :b

PLAYTHING OF A CRUEL GOD
JAIMIE NICHOLSON

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Justifying Achilles, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.