Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Mach mach@****.caltech.edu
Subject: _Magic in the Shadows_, anyone?
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 15:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
I'm mostly checking to see if I'm still subscribed and the list is
working. I've been in Lurker-mode for more than a few weeks now and
things have been rather quiet of late. (The lurker mode has been due to
my getting a job with Sierra Lobo, Inc., a subcontractor to NASA Ames
that does Engineering Support on the hypersonic arc-jet tunnels and some
of the other facilities here. I'll probably get back into things in a
few months, though.)

That being said, I picked up a copy of _Magic in the Shadows_ a week
ago, but haven't gotten a chance to read through it. I hope to rectify
that over the next few days, and maybe we can start a discussion as to
what implications, if any, the book (and the rules changes/
clarifications therein) will have on ShadowTk.

--Catch you later

Jeff
Message no. 2
From: Mach mach@****.caltech.edu
Subject: _Magic in the Shadows_, anyone?
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 15:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
I'm mostly checking to see if I'm still subscribed and the list is
working. I've been in Lurker-mode for more than a few weeks now and
things have been rather quiet of late. (The lurker mode has been due to
my getting a job with Sierra Lobo, Inc., a subcontractor to NASA Ames
that does Engineering Support on the hypersonic arc-jet tunnels and some
of the other facilities here. I'll probably get back into things in a
few months, though.)

That being said, I picked up a copy of _Magic in the Shadows_ a week
ago, but haven't gotten a chance to read through it. I hope to rectify
that over the next few days, and maybe we can start a discussion as to
what implications, if any, the book (and the rules changes/
clarifications therein) will have on ShadowTk.

--Catch you later

Jeff

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about _Magic in the Shadows_, anyone?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!