Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Nightblade <wgreason@*****.ocis.temple.edu>
Subject: Messages addressed to Rosha
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:50:38 -0400 (EDT)
Thanks again to Winter and Mark I (I think?) for stellar imagination on
my character's behalf. Both rationales sound good. I has always imagined
her private message receipts to work somewhere in the middle.

(E.G. Ash mails the message marked Private: Rosha... that's how it
appears on the BBS when she opens (decrypts) it. He also could mail it
addressed to the last person she "impersonated" using an agreed upon
encryption program, sent to a private mailbox. Now that I think about it,
that's the most secure way she would go about it.)

Thanks as well to everyone who's been so patient with this string.

peace
Dave
Message no. 2
From: Evan Hughes <ehughes@****.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: Messages addressed to Rosha
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 96 12:47:56 EDT
Nightblade writes:
> (E.G. Ash mails the message marked Private: Rosha... that's how it
> appears on the BBS when she opens (decrypts) it. He also could mail it
> addressed to the last person she "impersonated" using an agreed upon
> encryption program, sent to a private mailbox. Now that I think about it,
> that's the most secure way she would go about it.)

Why not setup a responder mailbox on some poorly guarded node. She sends
a message to that account, and within one or two seconds, the mailbox
account sends her all her mail?


Evan Hughes | Webmaster
Honours Computer Science | Carleton Computer Science Society
http://chat.carleton.ca/~ehughes | http://omega.scs.carleton.ca/~ccss
.. code code code eat code code code code code sleep code code code code ..

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Messages addressed to Rosha, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!