From: | Geoff Gerrietts <phinar@**.CENCOM.NET> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: More Maxim stuff on Farrleton and Riglia |
Date: | Mon, 24 Apr 1995 21:15:21 EDT |
refer to multinational status, but rather the status that makes a
corporation's physical property subject to their own laws and not the
laws of the local jurisdiction. In modern US, embassies are said to be
"extraterritorial" because within the confines of the embassy's
property lines, the owning country makes the law, not the U.S. or the
local authorities.
And why would anyone be interested? I'm sure that's the same question
that ran through the minds of many corporate execs when they heard
about Frypp's decker convention. After all, get half of
Seattle-in-the-Shadows watchin' your system, and someone outside the
shadows is gonna figure it needs to see what the fuss is about. I
would think that the *real* difficulty would be finding runners who
would agree to work against FryppSec, though I must say, you've been
none too careful about making sure of that...
<G> (phinar@******.net)
*Evil is a virtue worth examining.
**MQU/CH S G- Q+ 9++ y W++(-) C N+
***(boycotting GeekCode until OS/2 shows up there)