From: | plotd@*********.com (J. Mach) |
---|---|
Subject: | Regarding Henry |
Date: | Thu Feb 28 00:55:00 2002 |
From: J. Mach <jjmach@**********.com>
To: shadowtk@*********.com <shadowtk@*********.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: Regarding Henry
>*****PRIVATE: Gray
>>>>>>[If by "gig" you mean the request I put out for
surveilance assets
in
>Denver, yes, the position has not been filled. I am still taking
>>snippus<<
>to the table before we settle upon a final contract.]<<<<<
> -- Quicksilver <00:38:28/02-27-63 PDT>
>
>
>>
>>*****PRIVATE: Quicksilver
>>>>>>>[This gig still up for grabs?]<<<<<
>> -- Gray <14:21:09/02-25-63>
>>
Aw...crap. So much for my multi-year streak of no formatting errors. And
I'm usually good about deleting any excess after I reply. :/ Any chance a
web-based system would correct for this? Most web-mailers and news
browsers still allow you to reply-to and will include and carrot the
previous message.
I await my carp.
--Catch you later
Jeff