Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: NIGHTFOX <DJWA@******.UCC.NAU.EDU>
Subject: Shadowtalk Logs
Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 01:30:23 -0700
Shadowtalk Logs

log9504d
log9404e
log9405a

have been sent to Tk-log@*****

Nightfox
Message no. 2
From: "\"Daniel Waisley\" Nightfox" <djwa@******.UCC.NAU.EDU>
Subject: Shadowtalk logs
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:39:19 -0700
The Shadowtalk Logs for september
log9609

has been sent out to tk-log list and
will be uploaded to Itribe in a few minutes


Nightfox
Message no. 3
From: "\"Daniel Waisley\" Nightfox" <djwa@******.UCC.NAU.EDU>
Subject: Shadowtalk Logs
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 00:16:24 -0700
The Shadowtalk Logs for November have been sent out
they should also be uploaded tonight if all goes well.
Hopefully the next logs will not take me as long.


Brian (Angliss) the problem with the repeating >>>>> has
been fixed in the logs (wrote a small macro)


The really long post from the Denver Nexus that someone sent which
contained bad formatting and incorrect character usage which someone
spent lots of time writing - was deleted. I did start to edit it, but
once they started using too many FASA characters - I toasted it.


PS --- PLEASE REMEMBER TO PRESS [ENTER] those of you
who are using mail programs which don't word wrap correctly.
It gets to be a pain to make everything look nice.


Nightfox
Faithful Editor <Sucker>
Message no. 4
From: Sascha Pabst <Sascha.Pabst@**********.UNI-OLDENBURG.DE>
Subject: Re: Shadowtalk Logs
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 10:59:43 +0000
On 31 Dec 96 at 0:16, Nightfox wrote:
[snip]
> PS --- PLEASE REMEMBER TO PRESS [ENTER] those of you
> who are using mail programs which don't word wrap correctly.
> It gets to be a pain to make everything look nice.
*applaud* It's even a pain to read originally!

Sascha

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shadowtalk Logs, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!