Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: kawaii trunks@********.org
Subject: ShadowTk
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 22:22:02 -0500
Hi guy and gals. :)

Can we keep the OOC discussion to PlotD please? If you are not subscribed,
please subscribe to plotd. :)

I'm not anyone official, but I figure I'd stick my head in. ;) Please?
Thanks.

Ever lovable and always scrappy,
kawaii
Message no. 2
From: Pete Pete@*******.demon.co.uk
Subject: ShadowTk
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:22:39 -0000
From: "kawaii" <trunks@********.org>
To: <osuya@*****.com>; <bstroud@******.net>; <Pete@*******.demon.co.uk>
Cc: <plotd@*********.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 3:22 AM
Subject: ShadowTk


> Hi guy and gals. :)
>
> Can we keep the OOC discussion to PlotD please? If you are not subscribed,
> please subscribe to plotd. :)
>
> I'm not anyone official, but I figure I'd stick my head in. ;) Please?
> Thanks.
>
????
I changed the send to addy to PlotD... So what....???

Oh well, seems that the mysterious gremlins of my mailer are extending their
paws to pester me yet again... How irritating.

Thwap away to hearts content beveryody

--
Pete
Message no. 3
From: Brian Rogers <rogers@****.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: SHADOWTK
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 1994 10:05:58 -0500
This is mostly a test message (either I am missing it or there is nothing
in the faq about posting to plot-d).

I have been reading along with the shadowrun notes from SHADOWTK and would like
to join in sometime in the nearish future.

IF this test message works out, I will post more detailed information about
my character so someone can, if they wish, contact him for work.
Message no. 4
From: The Powerhouse <P.C.Steele@*********.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: SHADOWTK
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 1994 16:12:29 +0100
Well let's see Plot-d is here for plot direction on shadowtalk. Saying that
though it shouldn't limit the amount of spontaneonaity <sp ?> that can some
times occur. One of the best plots ever run and I think most people will
agree was the originally MONICA affair, plot-d didn't even exist then yet
creativity just seemed to flow.

Phill.
--
Phillip Steele - P.C.Steele@***.ac.uk - University Of Newcastle Upon Tyne
Message no. 5
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: SHADOWTK
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 1994 12:20:55 -0500
On Thu, 25 Aug 1994, Brian Rogers wrote:

> This is mostly a test message (either I am missing it or there is nothing
> in the faq about posting to plot-d).
>
> I have been reading along with the shadowrun notes from SHADOWTK and would like
> to join in sometime in the nearish future.
>
> IF this test message works out, I will post more detailed information about
> my character so someone can, if they wish, contact him for work.

You need to coordinate all of that stuff on the PLOT-D list, which is
for administrative a plot discussions. Information was provided in the FAQ.


____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> I do not necessarily speak for the
\/ Finger for PGP Public Key <=> City of Mankato or anyone else
Message no. 6
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: SHADOWTK
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 1994 12:22:41 -0500
On Thu, 25 Aug 1994, The Powerhouse wrote:

> Well let's see Plot-d is here for plot direction on shadowtalk. Saying that
> though it shouldn't limit the amount of spontaneonaity <sp ?> that can some
> times occur. One of the best plots ever run and I think most people will
> agree was the originally MONICA affair, plot-d didn't even exist then yet
> creativity just seemed to flow.

PLOT-D camer about because when MONICA I was run, there were only about
30 people and about 35 characters around, now it is many many many more.

____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> I do not necessarily speak for the
\/ Finger for PGP Public Key <=> City of Mankato or anyone else

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about SHADOWTK, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!