Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Avenger <Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Shadowtk logs
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 14:29:15 +0100
For those who are subscribed to the tklogs but not receiving them, or
want the logs they can be found at the following URL

ftp://listproc.itribe.net/pub/listserv/archives/

archives, old archives and shadowtk edited can be found

ftp://listproc.itribe.net/pub/listserv/

(basically back a dir) I can only find edited logs here up to November
1996. Presumably there are others.

www list archives in threaded format can be found here

http://listproc.itribe.net/shadowtk/

Hope someone finds all that useful :)

Question? Is anyone still editing the logs? If not, is this something
that still needs to be done? Mark?

Paul, you might want to edit the FAQ accordingly, before the next one
goes out. Until Mark gets a chance to sort his website out none of the
links in the FAQ or on the site work.


--
Avenger
Message no. 2
From: "Mark A. Imbriaco" <mark@******.NET>
Subject: Re: Shadowtk logs
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 10:50:57 -0400
> Question? Is anyone still editing the logs? If not, is this something
> that still needs to be done? Mark?

No. Yes.

> Paul, you might want to edit the FAQ accordingly, before the next one
> goes out. Until Mark gets a chance to sort his website out none of the
> links in the FAQ or on the site work.

Right.

Mark Imbriaco email: <mark@******.net>
iTribe, Inc. url: http://www.itribe.net/~mark/
Director of Engineering pgp/geek: http://www.itribe.net/~mark/codes.html

W e b W o n d e r s . O n l i n e O d d i t i e s . C o o l S t u f f

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shadowtk logs, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!