Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Brion Wauters <STU2204@****.COCO.CC.AZ.US>
Subject: TOSSIT question
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 12:39:53 -0700
Are we actually going to settle on a given method of extraction (and
back ups, etc.)? Or are we just going to leave it sort of vauge and
nebulous, so Bruce can use wich ever method he finds the most appealing?

Brion
Message no. 2
From: Erik Jameson <erikj@****.COM>
Subject: Re: TOSSIT question
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 16:29:19 -0500
At 12:39 PM 3/24/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Are we actually going to settle on a given method of extraction (and
>back ups, etc.)? Or are we just going to leave it sort of vague and
>nebulous, so Bruce can use which ever method he finds the most appealing?
>

I'm hoping that Bruce will give us the details we need to do this thing
later today, privately.

Right now, I think we're all just spinning our wheels, pulling all sorts of
ideas and info out of dark orifices. Until Bruce gives us hard data,
that's about all we can do.

But it's kind of cool anyway; how often do you see on TK, or in RL, a group
going through this much planning for a shadowrun? I'm getting a kick out
of it. I'm also starting to get anxious as to getting the show on the road.

Erik J.


"Oh, the silent helicopters and the men in black fatigues? They're just my
car pool to work."
Message no. 3
From: Bruce Ford <shaman@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: TOSSIT question
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 17:04:53 -0700
On Tue, 24 Mar 1998, Brion Wauters wrote:

> Are we actually going to settle on a given method of extraction (and
> back ups, etc.)? Or are we just going to leave it sort of vauge and
> nebulous, so Bruce can use wich ever method he finds the most appealing?

I think it should be settled on as a couple interesting posts could come
out of it but we'd probably end up writing them along the lines of the
meet post.

Bruce.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about TOSSIT question, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!