Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: plotd@*********.com (System Administrator)
Subject: Undeliverable: PlotD digest, Vol 1 #388 - 2 msgs
Date: Tue Feb 5 12:10:01 2002
Your message

To: plotd@*********.com
Subject: PlotD digest, Vol 1 #388 - 2 msgs

did not reach the following recipient(s):

NeonSamuria@***********.com on 2/5/02 9:11:43 AM
The person you are trying to e-mail has a full inbox. Please resend
at a later time.


x-sender: plotd-admin@*********.com
x-receiver: neonsamuria@***********.com
Received: from fastjack.dumpshock.com ([206.246.241.204]) by
collegeclub.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Tue, 5 Feb 2002
09:11:30 -0800
Received: from fastjack.dumpshock.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
fastjack.dumpshock.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B4739F0; Tue, 5 Feb 2002
12:05:01 -0500 (EST)
From: plotd-request@*********.com
Subject: PlotD digest, Vol 1 #388 - 2 msgs
X-Mailer: Mailman v2.0.1
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Sender: plotd-admin@*********.com
Errors-To: plotd-admin@*********.com
X-BeenThere: plotd@*********.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: plotd@*********.com
X-Reply-To: plotd@*********.com
List-Help: <mailto:plotd-request@*********.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:plotd@*********.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.dumpshock.com/mailman/listinfo/plotd>;,
<mailto:plotd-request@*********.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: ShadowTk Plot and Administrative Discussion <plotd.dumpshock.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.dumpshock.com/mailman/listinfo/plotd>;,
<mailto:plotd-request@*********.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.dumpshock.com/pipermail/plotd/>;
Message-Id: <20020205170501.38B4739F0@********.dumpshock.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:05:01 -0500 (EST)
Return-Path: plotd-admin@*********.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Undeliverable: PlotD digest, Vol 1 #388 - 2 msgs, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.