Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Mark Imbriaco <mark@********.IP.NET>
Subject: Re: Plot Idea.
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 1994 16:08:53 -0500
On Sat, 8 Oct 1994, Robert A. Hayden wrote:

> The question is: why is this more cost effective than getting properly
> trained soldiers?

Who's to say that it is? It could just be a way to ensure
absolute loyalty and single-minded ness. Also, they might
only be used for sensitive situations where threats against
families of corp guards is an issue. (Hard to threaten the
family of someone who was vat grown, chummer. :-)

> Not just in terms of cast, but also PR? It would have
> to be a really underhanded corp (ie, somebody that doesn't even HAVE a
> public image) in order to even THINK about trying to get away with these
> kinds of shinanigans.

I don't necessarily agree. Maybe the corp is using it as
a means to "field test" a new design or something? Like I
said, it was only the very basic beginning of a plot _idea_.
<shrug> I dunno.. I'll do some more thinking. I was just
reading ShadowTech again, and the thought sprung to mind
when the characters were talking about that possibility..

mark

_____ _ |\ o|\ | ______ I n t e r n e t P r e s e n c e & Publishing
| / | \ || \ |\ |__ | 1700 World Trade Center ofc: 804.446.9060
| \_ |_/.||_/.| \|\_ | Norfolk, Virginia 23510 fax: 804.446.9061
| | www: http://www.ip.net/ email: mark@***.ip.net
============================================================================
(GEEK CODE 2.1) GB/GCS/GE d? H s g+(-) !p au+ a- w+ v++ C++++
UX(L)(B)(A)(S)(I)(V)++++$ P++++$ L+++($) 3+ E+ N++ K++
W--- M+ V -po+ Y++ t+@ 5+++ j++ R+++ G+('''') tv+ b+++ D++
B--- e+(*) u+ h+(*) f+ r++ n---(----) x+

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.