From:	NIGHTFOX <djwa@******.UCC.NAU.EDU>
Subject:	Re: Invae
Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 1996 17:57:36 -0700 (MST)

> FASA has written a large number of things. Not all of which deserve credence.
> In the case of "Bug City", I think it's easiest to "allow" it
since this
> forum draws in lots of people from different backgrounds. Canon is supposed to
> be a unifying force in the absense of other concerns, as I take it. If it
> were up to me personally I'd nuke the entire sourcebook from orbit, but I'm not
> the only one here. =)

The problem is getting people to know this. If we have problems getting
people to read the FAQ and post correctly, then we will definately have
problems with getting them to ignore sourcebooks.

Novels are another matter - we tend to ignore them :) (unless Nigel
Findley wrote them)

> What I _do_ want to do is limit what I consider undesirable elements in this
> forum as much as possible. Just because FASA thinks Chicago has bugs doesn't
> mean I want the same for our version of Seattle....

Ok - Seattle can have bugs - it has had bugs, and will have them again.
WE WILL NOT BECOME CHICAGO OR EVEN CLOSE.

That is one thing EVERYONE should know. It doesn't even have to be agreed
on. Doing something like that to Seattle is against the "NO MAJOR CHANGES"
rule. The nuke plot skirted it, but was mostly used to weaken Maxim since
they were a bit to strong.

Bugs do appear in other cities, they tend to get hunted down now.
Universal Brotherhood is illegal.

Besides - we need a new enemy after we rip of Sword of Dog's head

(And I have one for this summer - muhahahaha!!!)


Nightfox