Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: mneideng@****.caltech.edu (Mark L. Neidengard)
Subject: Re: FW: Invae
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 19:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
According to Randy Nickel:
>
>>Quite possibly - but I want to know rather specifically what you have
>>in mind before stating my opinion with undue finality.
>
>I do not run bugs in the entirely standard fashion. In my game the
>Invae have taken over high Executive positions in the corporations and
>government. Sort of like "They Live" I think was the movie where aliens
>were such a big part of human society and nobody knew it.

Ummm....I hate to be blunt, but I am in no way prepared to support anything
remotely resembling "They Live" in the context of ShadowTK. I think that
clearly qualifies as a "radical" change in world premise. I also do not like
the idea of Invae monopolizing key positions in corporate and national
government; there is already ample opportunity for intrigue and conspiracy
without invoking the ravening hordes from Beyond. I find human pro/antagonists
to be much more compelling.

>A new person I plan to introduce goes after bugs/host in a big way. It
>is vey big part of who he is and what he does.

Ok...so he's the <Insert random creature here> Hunter archetype...that's fine,
but I don't feel like presenting him with a "target-rich" environment just
like that. If you could state explicitly what you want to do, perhaps I can
offer some particular suggestions.
--
/!\/!ark /!\!eidengard, CS Major, VLSI. http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/~mneideng
"Fairy of sleep, controller of illusions" Operator/Jack-of-all-Trades, CACR
"Control the person for my own purpose." "Don't mess with the Dark
Elves!"
-Pirotess, _Record_of_Lodoss_War_ Shadowrunner and Anime Addict

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.