Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Nightblade <wgreason@*****.ocis.temple.edu>
Subject: Re: Umm, Rosha, BB.
Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 01:22:15 -0400 (EDT)
OK... Rosha 'is' a halfling 'illusionist' adept. the metatype is
detailed in the NERPS -- Shadowlore base in the itribe-webpage. ( I think
I used all the correct compuspeak... ) It sounded cool (had a weakness
for halflings as a young D & D'er... ) so I went with it.

The issues I want to bring up here (hopefully it won't spiral into
a discussion like the "Free Spirits" as characters one, but if so, sobeit.)
... A) 'illusionist' adept: not 'sorcerer' adept. can only use illusion
spells, therefore gains a little leeway from DMs in terms of force of
spells and special spells... (see revised Rosha description forthcoming)

B) problems with an adept with cyberware: Rosha's knack is physical
penetration (get your minds out the gutter! :) ) of a target and
accessing the target matrix from inside (thus avoiding lots of ice and
using someone else's passcodes...) To this end, she has a datajack and
headware memory 60 mp. Functions basically as a tortoise. Other
cyberware for recon purposes and athletic purposes : balance augmentor and
spatial recognizer. Total Essence loss = 1 pt.

C) Initiate 2: B/c she is a subset of 'sorcerer' she still has no
access to astral plane. Therefore, she can only use Shielding and Masking.
and she cannot penetrate other Initiate's masks.

D) Personality: since the confident/flirtatious has been done. I'm
thinking friendly, trusting, ingenue (that's right I used an SAT word!)
type in social situations who clams up and gets the job done on a run.
Developed a couple background twists to surprise yall during gameplay,
but I still wanna make sure the details on this character pass the
existing DMs test. (Generally, think Mother Theresa with a calculated
edge for power and you start to get an idea... )

til next time
Dave

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.