Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Steven Ratkovich <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Chicago: a defence of the "newbies" (BTW,
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 21:52:22 -0500
>No specifics, but I do know that nearly all of the Universal Brotherhood
>affiliates have been knocked out on the North American continent shortly
>after (or maybe before) Chicago exploded.
>
>Thus, with the Universal Brotherhood suddenly squashed, there could be a
>number of questions arising from the general public about this sudden, sharp,
>and effective elimination of what looked like just another religious sect.
>
>In this way, I think an number of people would become aware of the threat of
>bugs.
>
>But I could be mistaken ... apathy should never be underrated.
>
>peace
>Dave
>
Ok guys, here's a comprimise...

For one, Bull hasn't had any outside contact with the rest of the world, so
he has no idea what anyone knows... He just wants to get the word out to
anyone and everyone whether they've heard it or not.

Next, we are going to introduce something a little unusual. it's still in
the works, and it won't be anything Earth Shattering, but should be
interesting and will (hopefully) be something that hasn't been done before.

Third. We are going to go under the assumption that there are still a good
number of people that do not know the truth. We are going to the public
with our info, whether they really want to hear it or not...

And last, can we just assume, since it hasn't been said one way or another,
that teh UCAS still publicly denies the existance of the bugs, or at least
downplays teh threat very severely, and that a large portion of teh populace
doesn't know about the bugs?

Just my suggestions...

Steve

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.