Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Mike Goldberg <michael.goldberg@*******.COM>
Subject: Bug info....
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:19:43 MST
Aside from the posting violation below, the last time someone posted
non-encrypted evidence of bugs, it resulted in the death of a
well-known and respected character, namely Powerhouse. IMHO, the bugs
wouldn't let this broadcast of information go unpunished.

Mike


______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject:
Author: Shadowrun Interactive Fiction <SHADOWTK@********.ITRIBE.NET> at SMTP-PO
Date: 12/11/96 2:12 PM


>>>>>[Hey Dom... Here's some data for ya...

+++++Download Bug_City:_City_Under_Seige.txt

That will give you a good rundown on each of the different bug types, from
Cockroach to Beetle, Mantis, Dragonfly, Firefly, and some of the other
funners... It aslo gives a good rundown on the Chicago situation.

And here's some proof. Will vid clips of each type of bug do?

+++++ Download Bull's_Bug_Collection.vid

And in case it was worth any money, forget it. This is info everyone needs
to know. I just got out of that hell-hole called Chicago, and there's more
data that needs to be worked out before it's released, but that should give
you a good start.]<<<<<
-- Bull <19:34:10/12-57>

At 10:29 AM 12/11/96 -0500, Casenelli, Anthony A. wrote:
>>>>>>[I've heard (and believe from my own encounters) Bugs discussed
here.
>I've only encountered hivers (Wasps, Ants). Can anyone give at
>least first-hand knowledge, if not proof, that individual types
>exist? Maybe beetles, maybe MOSQUITOS? This would answer a lot of
>questions for me and would up the worth of some info I have
>possibly for sale on a highly placed officer in a municipal (not
>local) law enforcement security agency.
>
>Any help? Offers?]<<<<<
>
> -- Dominic D'Amato <15:28:57/12-11-57>
> Chief Investigator
> Meta Investigations
>
>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.