| From: | Mike Goldberg <michael.goldberg@*******.COM> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re[2]: RS: Overview |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Dec 1996 09:48:10 MST |
just should have sent it private. If you are sending it to Red Shift
and Stonewall, just use Private: Red Shift, Stonewall. At the very
least cuts down on header noise.
Mike
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: RS: Overview
Author: james-cueno@*********.edu at SMTP-PO
Date: 12/19/96 7:27 AM
> *****Internal: Red Shift
> *****PRIVATE: Stonewall
> >>>>>[OK, sorry about the delay, some of the gear we need for this was
> narder to come by than I expected. We now have the charges, claymores
> and fuses. Gates has constructed a 3D representation of the site, which
> we will use to plane our attack.
Now this is interesting. I'm assuming this is a message from an
internal system with a copy going outside as well?
Anyone have any ideas on how to handle this one in the future?
jim cueno
dread executor
shadowtk
