| From: | Dark Avenger <Avenger@********.DEMON.CO.UK> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RS: Overview |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Dec 1996 13:14:09 +0000 |
Goldberg <michael.goldberg@*******.COM> writes
> If you are sending it encrypted to one person in Red Shift, then you
> just should have sent it private. If you are sending it to Red Shift
> and Stonewall, just use Private: Red Shift, Stonewall. At the very
> least cuts down on header noise.
>
> Mike
>
Agreed, the only problem is that where it is a post internal to red
shift, with a courtesy copy going out to Stonewall for collating
purposes, using a private header didn't seem right. The person posting
the message is a member of red shift, and therefore would recieve his
own mail, on a Private header, also where it was internal, I used the
internal header. Stonewall is sort of a cc:
If it makes it easier for everyone then I'll just stick to the Private
header, but that isn't really accurate and doesn't reflect the fact that
it is a sort of "organisation" :)
--
__ \ | \
| | _` | __| | / _ \ \ \ / _ \ __ \ _` | _ \ __|
| | ( | | < ___ \ \ \ / __/ | | ( | __/ |
____/ \__,_|_| _|\_\ _/ _\ \_/ \___|_| _|\__, |\___|_|
A dark shadow in a dark world |___/
