| From: | Dark Avenger <Avenger@********.DEMON.CO.UK> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RS: Overview |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Dec 1996 23:11:12 +0000 |
Goldberg <michael.goldberg@*******.COM> writes
> How about doing this:
>
> ***** Internal: Red Shift
> >>>>>[
>
> +++++ To: Red Shift, Stonewall
>
> (message ) ]<<<<<
>
> Just an idea.
>
> Mike (the one blowing up churches in Berlin)
Seems OK, but Stonewall isn't part of Red Shift. So I'm not sure if TO:
would work, also with the opposition still an unknown quantity, anything
transmitted out, would preferably have a stronger encryption than TO:
offers.
I'm happy to go with whatever the list suggests, I'd just like to make
sure the posts are protected. :)
__ \ | \
| | _` | __| | / _ \ \ \ / _ \ __ \ _` | _ \ __|
| | ( | | < ___ \ \ \ / __/ | | ( | __/ |
____/ \__,_|_| _|\_\ _/ _\ \_/ \___|_| _|\__, |\___|_|
A dark shadow in a dark world |___/
