Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Mike Goldberg <michael.goldberg@*******.COM>
Subject: Re[2]: Thunda's complaint
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 13:03:29 MST
Hey, folks it is real simple, unless you have permission of the person
who wrote the message to break the encryption, it says in the FAQ you
can't do it. Since it did happen, without the owner's approval, what
is going to be done about it?

Personally, I don't want to see more encryption than is already used.
I don't like when I have to use the stuff, and I certainly don't want
to have to read through more of the stuff.

Mike


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Thunda's complaint
Author: ShadowTk Plot and Administrative Discussion
<PLOTD@********.ITRIBE.NET> at SMTP-PO
Date: 12/27/96 12:45 PM


|How would it suit your plot, to have people commenting on everything you
|posted? Especially when it was posted privately? I don't want to start
|an argument here, but I was under the impression that PRIVATE was a sort
|of sacrosanct thing. If it says Private, leave it alone. It's pretty
|clear in the FAQ, maybe I am overreacting, but this is the third time
|that it has happened, and I felt it was time it was mentioned.

Didn't realise it'd happened before.....

Hmmmmmm....
--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell | |
|Principal subjects in:- | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! >*SULK*<|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.