Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Thunda's complaint
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 20:12:09 +0000
|
| Hey, folks it is real simple, unless you have permission of the person
| who wrote the message to break the encryption, it says in the FAQ you
| can't do it. Since it did happen, without the owner's approval, what
| is going to be done about it?

I say that we simply delete the response posts from the log, if possible,
and forget they ever happened.....

| Personally, I don't want to see more encryption than is already used.
| I don't like when I have to use the stuff, and I certainly don't want
| to have to read through more of the stuff.

If someone responds to a PRIVATE post, just ignore it, or, if you didn't
realise it was a private one, disregard it when that fact comes to light....

--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell | |
|Principal subjects in:- | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! >*SULK*<|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.