Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jeffrey Mach <mach@****.CALTECH.EDU>
Subject: Re: State of emergency
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 18:03:49 -0800
On Wed, 5 Mar 1997, Brad Shantz wrote:

> Yes, the president is the only one who can declare a state of emergency
> at a national level.
>
> Current president? Sage Stallone?
>
> Brad
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 1997, Jaimie Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > Only american players will know the answer to this... in the USA, is
> > it the
> > president who declares a state of emergency? If not, who can? And can
> > anyone else?
> >
> > And who is the current president up in shadowrun time?

Can't remember the name offhand, anybody have (or seen lately) the _Super
Tuesday_ sourcebook? I don't think it was Stallone, and Mrs. Clinton
would be dead by 2058 (or at least we can hope). Duklezahn got himself
elected, then assasinated. His VP would now be president. I think the
guy had some sort of ties to a corp, but I don't fully remember. That's
of course if you are asking about the UCAS (which Seattle is part of).

As for a state of emergency, the scope of the state is basically dependant
on the scope of the power of the executive calling it. I believe that
governors can call a state of emergency in their own respective states. I
figure something similar on down. Also, depends on what you want to do.
To call a place a "Federal Disaster Area" and entitle yourself to getting
some of the disaster relief money from the feds, it has to be declared by
Congress or the President. Also, a mayor declaring a state of emergency
in a city doesn't have the power to say, call out the national guard,
which the President does.

I would have to agree with Mike though. It isn't something you do
lightly, and there better be a good reason for it. (i.e. You go to plotd
and everybody agrees that the South [now the CAS] is about due for another
hurricane, but this ones going to be a real monster.)

--My two yen

Jeff

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.