Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Mike Goldberg <michael.goldberg@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Maxim, again?!
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 11:16:50 MST
Before we get into the Maxim this and that, Brian, who was in charge
of the virus when Maxim got ahold of "Randal Flagg?" Was it Velli
that had her hands in it?

I tend to agree though, Maxim, a first-tier wannabe, shouldn't be
getting its hands into every nasty thing that comes along. Its not
all that good for the reputation, and reputation is a primary means of
propelling oneself ahead in the corporation race.

Ever wonder why Pepsi is losing to Coca-Cola in the soda war? It's
because Pepsi has its hand in the restaurant biz and its restaurant
competitors don't want to give them more revenue by using Pepsi
products. In the restaurant business, Coke has 70% share of the soft
drink market. That fear has gained Coca-Cola a _LOT_ of money.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Maxim, again?!
Author: ShadowTk Plot and Administrative Discussion
<PLOTD@********.ITRIBE.NET> at SMTP-PO
Date: 3/26/97 11:02 AM


Why is it that Maxim always gets the nasty stuff? First they had Dante (OK,
they where just taking advantage of what he was doing, but still), then they
had the nukes (which that witch Velli tricked Irish into helping them steal),
and now they got "Randal Flagg"!

I know that Maxim is Brian's baby, but can we please, please, blast them back
to the stone-age? It was bad enough with just Aztechnology. At least with
the Azzies, you didn't _know_ what they had. It made it alot easier to go
through life without knowing that some power-hungry, consciousless, murderous
corp with a grudge against several members of the shadow comunity had gotten
their hands on a super weapon.

Just my two cents.

Brion

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.