Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jeffrey Mach <mach@****.CALTECH.EDU>
Subject: Re: Hmm... a question or two....
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 17:08:09 -0800
On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Michael Broadwater wrote:

> Jeffrey Mach [SMTP:mach@****.CALTECH.EDU]
>
> >On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Michael Broadwater wrote:
>
> >> 1) Is a magican (or shaman) able to astrally perceive if a fence is under
> >> high voltage ??
> >>
> >> Can't see why they could.
>
> >Huh? They can astrally perceive _through_ a chain link fence, by LOS
> >rules, if that is what you mean. I don't see how high voltage has
> >anything to do with it? The original question doesn't make much sense.

> The original question makes perfect sense. It wasn't aske if he could
> see through the fence. He asked if you could see if the fence was under
> heavy voltage (electrified). I said 'no'. Read the question more
> carefully before you shoot down my response.

My apologies, and now that I see it the right way, I totally agree.
Yeah...I have been misreading some posts lately, like the one where a
quick read without looking at where the post was being sent made me fall
over laughing. It began: ">>>>>[Achilles sanction Lynch."
(which I took
to be a command and not a declarative) and then went on a tirade about
"him" and "he" being on the receiving end of cruel and unusual
punishment.
By the end I had figured out that it was D'Arkan talking _TO_ Lynch
regarding Haze, but by then, the damage had been done in my mind. =)

> >Mike? What the smeg is this:
>
> >> begin 600 WINMAIL.DAT
> ><<SNIP 39 lines of uuencoded crud>>
> >> end
>
> Freaking MSMailer crap. I thought I had that fixed.
>
> Michael Broadwater
>
> begin 600 WINMAIL.DAT
> M>)\^(A8``0:0" `$```````!``$``0>0!@`(````Y 0```````#H``$(@ <`
> M& ```$E032Y-:6-R;W-O9G0@**%I;"Y.;W1E`#$(`0V ! `"`````@`"``$$
<<SNIP>>

Guess you haven't. Still.

--Catch you later

Jeff

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.