Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Business?
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:33:40 EST
In a message dated 98-03-03 14:57:40 EST, mach@****.caltech.edu writes:

> Since the message is already *****PRIVATE to Faerie, then I don't see the
> reason why the section you encrypted needed to be any more private than
> the rest of it. (As a side note, since I know a little more about the
> character than you do, too much technomantic legendermain may make the
> post quite unreadable for her...but I guess that is up to Jaimie to
> decide.)
>
Okay, I have to ask something on this topic. What about "Topic Trace &
Report"? The information is moving all over the WWW/Net. If a Trace of some
sort was involved at a given LTG or RTG structure, then it -could- find a
given word and bring it down, even if it was encrypted.

Defeating the encryption would be the "opposed test" between the reading
program and the encryption of the file itself.

I have -really- wondered this concerning the "SIGA/Farmer" thread, which is
-really- good work, but has a LOT of openings that both sides seem to be
missing that I find really obvious.

-K

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.