Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Prophet's Soul
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 18:01:32 EST
In a message dated 98-03-24 11:51:50 EST, jeanpell@****.IVIC.QC.CA writes:

> > > I think your missing a digit there. Or else a major amount of
> > > credibility, since I have about seen as many uber-wunderkind as I can
> > > stomach.
> >
>
> You didn't answer that one, K... 9... he's 9? What the FUCK is he doing in
> the shadows? ( I really hope he has some otaku angle).

Did I have to answer a question? There was no question actually listed if you
read that carefully.

And I will say that "Reflex" was a decker, but he was played as a decker back
in 91-92 when Otaku didn't exist. It was a jokish idea that we were bouncing
around at the time. A Gang that called itself, "the Lost Boys" from Atlanta,
who were the eyes and ears of another group of individuals (the players). And
when it came time to actually make some newer characters, the gang was used as
the template for the PCs to be.

> >
> > Jeff, It's amazed that you don't understand Quest of Knowledge at all.
It
> > -can- be used for things like Street Reps and the like, especially if
> directed
> > towards the Metaplanes of Man. "Biology", which includes Bio/Cyber
> > implantware knowledge, is also on the planes.
> >
> > And in theory, with assensing, you are correct. However, you just go
> right on
> > ahead and think of the story however you want, and we'll continue with
our
> > own.
>
> That's the reason for my little outburst of a while back. There...again.
> Someone goes ahead, and breaks some canon rules, and doesn't give at least
> a decent warning on PlotD. Quests are very, very potent weapons. But
> there's some things that Quests can't do. You just broke that limit under
> the holy banner of "story developpement". Please, next time you do break
> some rules... please advise us.

First of all, what rules were broken? The "story development" that is
happening is happening within a given story that is NOT effecting your
characters in any way.

And you are correct that a Quest is a very powerful thing. BUT it is
something within the Canon Rules of SR. The only problem is the total details
are not given and everyone, including you and I, are forced into making
various guesses and "assumptions" (damn, twice within an hour on that word).

> Please understand that TK is supposed to be "the same world"... not your
> plot, my plot, his plot. We're all inter-connected. Now...if you say
> astral Quests can do this, I must take that into account in MY plots. And
> sometimes, that throws off plans just a bit. And sometimes, I just sit
> back and say "Villers' son... Super Quests... What's next?"
> Trinity

Whatever is decided upon.

Lots of storylines play out the idea of a "big persons' kid", old idea or not.
It is a well established idea none-the-less. Quest of Knowledge (personal
background) is NOT a super quest, by the books rulings or by several house
rulings that I know of. It -IS- considered a house ruling as a "super quest"
by some, I do realize that. But not by everyone.

I have a question, and I want the admins to answer this one.

IS "TK" a pbem being run by yourselves or not?

That is the ultimate question and hence the ultimate "ruling" that can be made
concerning TK.

If it is, I would really like to know.

There is nothing in your FAQ's about this that I have found that were sent to
me. I also know of SEVERAL people who have had similar problems with this
attitude that is given off by mainstay list members and hence quit.

Yes, I am perturbed, but not frighteningly so.

Adam, Mark, some ADMIN, please, answer this question to me, and answer it to
me privately or publicly, I don't care. But answer it honestly. I have
refrained from the name calling or anything else because repeatedly I run into
this 'attitude', and repeatedly, I run into the "YOU CAN'T DO THAT!!!"
response.

But for lack of better terms, I want a "GM Ruling", and I would really
appreciate it now.

But it is something that you guys aren't answering.

-K

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.