From: | Mach <mach@****.CALTECH.EDU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Check one, check two... |
Date: | Tue, 18 Aug 1998 17:03:01 -0700 |
> On 18 Aug 98, at 14:34, Mach wrote:
>
> Date sent: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 14:34:22 -0700
> Send reply to: ShadowTk Plot and Administrative Discussion
> <PLOTD@********.ITRIBE.NET>
> From: Mach <mach@****.CALTECH.EDU>
> Subject: Check one, check two...
> To: PLOTD@********.ITRIBE.NET
>
> > So, if either of these messages, but not both have the "problem" I
might
> > be able to tell what it is. If not, I don't know what causes the problem.
>
> As succsessful... :-)
Well, that pretty much settles it. I thought perhaps it might have
something to do with running off of an SGI vs. an HP, which would explain
the non-uniform occurence of the problem, since, due to load balancing at
the cluster I email from, there is a chance of ending up at one or the
other. Officially, now, I have no clue.
I see the "Reply To:" field saying plotd correctly. Jhary sees it
correctly. So, the only thing I can think, is if there are people out
there where the field _is_ overridden, the problem may be at your end.
--My two yen
Jeff