Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: James Dening james.dening@****.co.uk
Subject: [RE: [RE: [Re: [RE: Rhasta'k']]]]
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:39:24 +0100
sophist n : someone whose reasoning is subtle and often specious [syn:
{casuist}]
sophistry n : a deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in
reasoning in the hope of deceiving someone [syn: {sophism}]

i.e. Saying "If anyone has a mental problem with that then I understand",
when there has been
no previous mention of mental problems in the context of the conversation,
then saying "I never said
anyone had a mental problem."

To argue formally:

My refutation uses the fact that aforementioned mental problem was
introduced to the line
of conversation by you, and therefore can possibly only imply that someone
indeed has
a mental problem. To claim otherwise is sophistry. :-)

>
>Sorry James... I'm a 15 year old Freshman and I have no idea
>what sophistory
>means. Could you dumb it down, for me?

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.