Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: plotd@*********.com (Pete)
Subject: Ratspeak
Date: Thu Jun 21 06:35:00 2001
From: "Michael Goldberg" <michael.goldberg3@********.att.net>
To: "plotd" <plotd@*********.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:05 AM
Subject: Ratspeak


> Hi --
>
> I'm still working on a way to cover the huge gap of time between parts of
> the story.

Good luck on that Mike, I have absolutely no idea at all on anything to
suggest to help you as I have stories of my own with nearly a two year gap
in them... irritating but, well, my own fault I guess.

>(As well as sorting through the dramatic change in my life in
> the past couple of weeks.)

Nothing adverse I hope?

> apart from communication off-list that I have had with Paul, there
probably
> isn't enough on shadowtk to really make suggestions on how to go about it.

I wish I could help, but being stuck in an identical situation myself and
having no real idea how to play catch-up with any of it, I'm as much at a
loss as you appear to be. :)

> 1) This is indeed the Ratspeak and not an imposter.

Aww, and there I was prepping a character to start laying accusations. <g>

> never been my intention to use Ratspeak as a vehicle for a personal attack
> on an author. I respect the amount of time and effort people put into
their
> characters, and the fact that they want to share these characters with
> others.

Funny, out of all the characters that I've started arguments with that is
one thing I have never suspected you or ratspeak of. Now I wonder why that
would be?

> 4) Ratspeak's commenting on things is not a good indication on how other
> characters might react to things.

Hehe, standard fare for the forum methinks. Having said that though,
there's nought wrong with making assumptions from a character POV, for the
simple reason that sometimes innocent comments can lead on to further plot
expansion. Some people just can't help adding two and two and making seven.

> in the rodent's latest response. (It was the whole time thing, in case
you
> missed it.) The rodents comments are merely a decker's musings with way
too
> much free time on its "paws".

Must confess I whinced at that, the "time thing" came a little too close to
the mark to be honest.

> Pete, it is good to see you actively posting again.

Thanks Mike, it's nice to finally have the time to devote to this list. I
feel rather guilty over having abandoned it for so long.

> PS. I forgot to mention one other thing. Despite the list's tendencies
to
> have heroes on it,

I have been guilty of this once or twice but mostly I try to steer clear of
it.

>my assumption has always been that most shadowrunners
> don't give a damn about doing the right thing. That is a large part of
what
> I think makes the players' characters in the SR universe tend to stand out
> from the run of the mill shadowrunners. Therefore, it is my assumption
that
> most of the average readers of the node do not care about the larger
social
> issues that exist in the SR universe but rather, how can they continue to
> exist.

Agreed totally. This very much mirrors my view on the whole thing. Not of
course that I object to heroes though I can get a little antsy when they
save the world regularly - that's Bond's domain after all. :) I won't
publish my opinions of Shadowrunners and their philosophies here, I think
I've started quite enough rows over the years with my views of this section
of society. :)

Anyway, nice to see you posting too Mike. Hopefully a few more people will
come out of the woodwork and we can get some life back into this list again.

--
Pete
Shadowtk FAQ & Newcomers Guide http://www.shalako.demon.co.uk/stk/
Shadowrun stuff http://www.shalako.demon.co.uk/
CGI Stuff http://www.shalako.plus.com/

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.