Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: [ADMIN] No Attachments (was Re: question)
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 20:35:45 -0800
---Norman McLeod <sauta@******.COM> wrote:
>
> Here's a complete list of spoilers
>
> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/octet-stream

Please avoid sending attachments of ANY kind to the list. You would
have been better off posting that you had such a spoiler list and that
those who were interested write you to receive it via private email.

The sending of attachments to SRCard is explicitly covered in the FAQ.
List members may be using mailers that puke when receiving
attachments, others may even get fired if attachments are downloaded
when pulling their mail at work, still others simply don't want to
deal with downloading unsolicited items.

Please go over the FAQ again if need be (it's URL is in my sig) and
abide by the few rules we have put forth there.

Thank you.

-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 12/3/97
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message no. 2
From: Norman McLeod <sauta@******.COM>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] No Attachments (was Re: question)
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 13:13:41 -0800
I'm REALLY sorry about sending the list to spoiler list to everyone, I
didn't realize that I wasn't responding to just the sender, in the future
I'll be sure to check these things, once again, I'm REALLY SORRY!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [ADMIN] No Attachments (was Re: question), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.