Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: [ADMIN] Warez d00d SPeeK (was Re: (OT) Death of a game)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 13:03:42 -0700
---Zorgaff Shlongor <godzone@*********.COM> wrote:
>
<<< if they have a problem understanding it, they can just sound it out, yea,
like we all learned in kindergarden and 1st grade... it shouldn't matter if
someone uses ebonix or not >>>

It's a matter of common courtesy and netiquette. Especially when dealing with
an international list.

It's a simple fact that the admin have asked something be done in regards to
posting guidelines. That should be all.

Ebonix, Warez SPeeK, whatever the lingo of the month is, doesn't have a place
when posting to SRCard. We have enough of our own accepted abreviations and
acronyms if someone wants to be colorful and cool in their postings: IOW, BTW,
FWIW, IIRC, FYI, LOL, ROTFL, ...

Not to mention, SRTCG and FASA specific ones: DLOH, LotI, GAQS, LotP, CtH,
RBT, ...

It's an argument that was brought up on the list before, within it's first
week, and it's one that won't be won. (IIRC the perp of that incident got
himself banned.) Stick to plain old english, with the usual netiquette/SRTCG
acronyms and you can't go wrong.

Welcome to the 6th World. Play nice.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/9/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [ADMIN] Warez d00d SPeeK (was Re: (OT) Death of a game), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.