Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Another FASA GAQS repsonse (this time to Tinner) [Long]
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 20:18:51 -0700
Here's another response I got on a GAQS/Timing letter I forwarded to
FASA (this time from Tinner). I felt it only fair to post this one to
you guys as well.

~~~~~~~~~~
---FASACorp2@***.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 9/16/97 7:59:40 AM, you wrote:
>
> <<Don't let SRTCG become a battle of rules
> lawyers and timing issues. It's too fun the way it is.>>
>
> REPLY: Don't worry. The last thing we want is for SRTCG to become a
battle
> of rules lawyers and timing issues. Where's the fun in that?
>
> <<<I also thought you'd like to see the other side of the whole
> timing/GAQS debate. I've pasted a post from another list member to
> show how some of us are really liking the work you guys are putting
> out.
>
> Take care and keep up the good work!>>>
>
> Thanks!
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~
>
> ---"Steven A. Tinner" wrote:
> >
> > > --- Loki wrote:
> > >The first example with Archie requires the card be turned. If it's
> > >already turned it's too late to use Archie's special. That's why
in
> > >the FASA response in our Q&A it is recommended that you use Archie
> to
> > >turn the target Runner after your opponent has unturned them
during
> > >the refresh phase, or during their Legwork phase before the runner
> is
> > >turned for any other purpose.
> >
> > Is it just me, or is Archie McD SRTCG's answer to Magic's Icy
> Manipulator?
> > Lots of people never understood how that worked either! ;-)
> >
> > It's simple really.
> > Archie can stop a runner from going on a run by turning them before
> they go
> > on a run.
> > Once they have turned to go on a run, turning them again will not
> prevent
> > anything.
> > All Archie does is TURN runners.
> > If that's done early enough, it may prevent a run, if not it does
> NOTHING.
> > Simple.
> >
> > >> Player 1 (reveals Booby Trap): I sleaze with Ajax and go on
> > >> Player 2 (plays QAGS): No you don't Ajax is sent back to the
> > >> safehouse, trash another runner... (insert evil laugh :-) )
> >
> > I think people are reading way too much inot GAQS.
> > Yeah, it's good.
> > However the timing is not that tough.
> > According to the rule book, you get to read the challenge
> requirements to
> > your opponent.
> > If your'e too stupid to remember what challenge you played and GAQ
> the right
> > runner pre-emptively, just re-read the challenge to yourself, and
> THEN GAQ
> > before you read it to your opponent.
> > Where's the timing problem?>>>
>
> REPLY: Cool! This is my kind of player!!! (JN)
>
> > Also, according to the basic plain vanilla rulebook, there ARE
> definate
> > phases to the turn.
> > If you want to do something to prevent a certain runner from taking
> an
> > action, make sure you do it before he has a chance!
> > If you don't want BamBam going to the Iron Lung, use Archie to turn
> him
> > during the credstick phase.
> > Want to keep Static from visiting Fuchi? Turn him BEFORE the
Legwork
> phase.
> >
> > I think a lot of the so-called timing issues are due to impatient
> players
> > thinking that they can just bulldog through the phases.
> > Not so, because players can play some cards (stingers, character
> abilities)
> > at ANY time, they logically MUST be given the opportunity to do so.
> > You can't simply cruise past your legwork phase and go on a
> Shadworun if you
> > opponent wants to use Archie McD in the Legwork Phase.>>>
>
> REPLY: DEFINITELY my kind of player!! (JN again)
>
>
> > It usually helps if the players verbally annouce what phase they're
> in.
> > If you're playing a prick who doesn't, make sure you ask him. "What
> phase
> > are you doing?"
> > Tell him that you want to do something in the Legwork Phase too.
> > Sure that lets him react to your turning of his runners, but what's
> that
> > going to do for him?
> > I haven't seen anything to un-turn a runner yet, so no big deal.
> > Same thing for the Challenges.
> > Don't be a jerk and try to "speed-sleaze" everything.
> > Try playing fairly and letting your opponent react to each card.
> > Bull posted a breakdown of the "Challenge turning segment" of the
> game that
> > is simple, logical and works within the rules as they are.
> >
> > Too many reversed ruling did serious damage to MtG.
> > I'd hate to see FASA do the same.
> > IMO there are NO broken cards in SRTCG.
> > Just a few goofy players! ;-)
> >
> > Steven A. Tinner>>
>
> LOKI,
>
> Thanks for sending this! It's renewed my faith in card gamers.
Steven is on
> the same wavelength we are--he's playing to have fun.
>
> Jim N.
~~~~~~~~~~

===
@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr

"You're calling me Bitch like it's a bad thing."
--> CrapGame during the Drive in the Country tournament
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com
Message no. 2
From: "Steven A. Tinner" <bluewizard@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Another FASA GAQS repsonse (this time to Tinner) [Long]
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:06:21 -0400
>> REPLY: Cool! This is my kind of player!!! (JN)
>> REPLY: DEFINITELY my kind of player!! (JN again)
>> Thanks for sending this! It's renewed my faith in card gamers.
>Steven is on the same wavelength we are--he's playing to have fun.
>>
>> Jim N.

Well geez ... don't I feel all flattered and everything! :-)

Steven A. Tinner
bluewizard@*****.com
http://www.ncweb.com/users/bluewizard
"Until you find something worth dying for, you're not really living"

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Another FASA GAQS repsonse (this time to Tinner) [Long], you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.