Logs for ShadowRN and Associated Mailing Lists

From:	Lady Jestyr <jestyr@*******.COM.AU>
Subject:	[Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 1999 10:29:31 +1000

Message no. 1 The subject line says it all. Thankyou.

Lady Jestyr

SRCard Assistant Fearless Leader
SRCard Homepage: http://shadowrun.html.com/users/jestyr/srcard/
"Why do they always give the tricky powers to the hopelessly feeble
pincushion?"
jestyr@*********.html.com URL: http://shadowrun.html.com/users/jestyr

From:	Gabe Rosario <Brakiss187@***.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 1999 14:34:14 EST

Message no. 2 In a message dated 2/5/99 7:51:24 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jestyr@*******.COM.AU writes:

> The subject line says it all. Thankyou.
>
> Lady Jestyr
shit at least this guy is trying to do something productive for the
game....geez did it mess up your widdle bitty computer....no!!!

brak 4:69

yes im back and i have a lot to say, but not right now.

From:	Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 1999 11:42:16 -0800

Message no. 3 Brak wrote:
>i have a lot to say, but not right now.

Thank God for small miracles.

Brak, you talked about your Mother May I deck. I thought that was a real
good start to an actual Shadowrun conversation from your side. I was
really looking forward to seeing it posted, so I could consider trying it
in my group. However, I haven't seen it yet. I'm sure you haven't had
time to post it, but people are curious:

What's this "Mother May I" deck that will stop the Big Boys decks? I think
it would be great to see it on this list. You could even add your
commentary to it, and we could start up another Shadowrun conversation on
this list. We could ask questions about it, and you could let us know how
you had intended the deck to be played.

Think about it, ok?

From:	Gunnar Lundquist <OneWay919@***.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 1999 17:29:53 EST

Message no. 4 In a message dated 2/6/99 11:43:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
jonathan.edwards@*****.COM writes:

<<
What's this "Mother May I" deck that will stop the Big Boys decks? I think
it would be great to see it on this list. You could even add your
commentary to it, and we could start up another Shadowrun conversation on
this list. We could ask questions about it, and you could let us know how
you had intended the deck to be played.
>>

Jon,
I played against this at GenCon and it is all he says it is. It is designed
to let him control the game and it works...not 100% but it does work

OneWay

From:	Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 1999 15:36:38 -0800

Message no. 5 >
>Jon,
>I played against this at GenCon and it is all he says it is. It is designed
>to let him control the game and it works...not 100% but it does work
>

I'm sure it is. I definitely believe it, especially since I believe you
and another person testified to its toughness. I just want to see it
because I really, REALLY want to use it. And it gets away from negativity
comments and offers something constructive.

From:	Gabe Rosario <Brakiss187@***.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 1999 21:08:28 EST

Message no. 6 In a message dated 2/6/99 8:21:41 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jonathan.edwards@*****.COM writes:

>
> I'm sure it is. I definitely believe it, especially since I believe you
> and another person testified to its toughness. I just want to see it
> because I really, REALLY want to use it. And it gets away from negativity
> comments and offers something constructive.
>
>
okay okay...here it is..but first things first this deck has lost..not much
but it has lost...

BRAK'S MOTHER MAY I DECK

runners

static x 4
thrash x 3
ice queen x 3
jade x 4
dodger
the mole

locations

fuchi x 4
aztechnology
saeder-krupp

gear

lucky wabbits foot
fuchi cyber-6 x 2
sticky fingers x 2

specials

deja vu x 3
bad rep x 3
loaded dice x 4
loti x 4
stand aside x 2
moonlighting x 2
gaq x 4
whoops! x 3
wild goose chase x 2
bad lunch
cowards
false mentor

challenges

booby trap x 4
sabotaged controls
corpselight
chomps x 2
incubus x 3
double jeopardy x 2
hellish traffic x 4
fusion gate
maglocks x 2
security consultant x 2

objectives

sucker run x 4
king of the hill
site of power x 3
amazonian hunt
the vault

and there it is... this deck really kicks ass with some of the corp war cards
but of course i can't add those...don't want to end up in the people's
court...so they weren't included and the cards i removed for those cards, i
put back..

i welcome all comments

brak

mind over matter = if you don't mind, why should it matter????

From:	Adam J <adamj@*********.HTML.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Sun, 7 Feb 1999 00:19:19 -0700

Message no. 7 At 14:34 2/6/99 -0500, Gabe Rosario wrote:

>> The subject line says it all. Thankyou.
>>
>shit at least this guy is trying to do something productive for the
>game....geez did it mess up your widdle bitty computer....no!!!

While Zach's post was indeed non-harmful, somewhat on-topic, and rather
funny, the posting guidelines have been in place since the day the list
opened -- yes, even before you got here Gabe. The moment a mailing list
starts slacking on its guidelines, everyone feels they can abuse them, and
then all hell breaks lose. Warning people who post attachments or otherwise
violate the posting guidelines is a preventative measure.

You can run your own little list as much like a virtual anarchy as you
like, and I really don't give a rip. But on here, if you're "back and have
a lot to say", you play by this lists rules, because like it or not, you're
not the most important person in the world, and SRCard will move on with or
without you.

-Adam J

From:	Gabe Rosario <Brakiss187@***.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Sun, 7 Feb 1999 15:36:17 EST

Message no. 8 In a message dated 2/7/99 5:59:50 AM Eastern Standard Time,
adamj@*********.HTML.COM writes:

> But on here, if you're "back and have
> a lot to say", you play by this lists rules, because like it or not, you're
> not the most important person in the world, and SRCard will move on with or
> without you.
ouch adam.im not important??? im gonna cry and unsubscribe now..

brak

From:	Donald Arganbright <jayden63@*******.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 1999 10:01:53 MST

Message no. 9 Hoi,

>okay okay...here it is..but first things first this deck has >lost..not
much but it has lost...
>
>
>BRAK'S MOTHER MAY I DECK
>
>
>runners
>
>static x 4
>thrash x 3
>ice queen x 3
>jade x 4
>dodger
>the mole
>
>locations
>
>fuchi x 4
>aztechnology
>saeder-krupp
>
>gear
>
>lucky wabbits foot
>fuchi cyber-6 x 2
>sticky fingers x 2
>
>specials
>
>deja vu x 3
>bad rep x 3
>loaded dice x 4
>loti x 4
>stand aside x 2
>moonlighting x 2
>gaq x 4
>whoops! x 3
>wild goose chase x 2
>bad lunch
>cowards
>false mentor
>
>challenges
>
>booby trap x 4
>sabotaged controls
>corpselight
>chomps x 2
>incubus x 3
>double jeopardy x 2
>hellish traffic x 4
>fusion gate
>maglocks x 2
>security consultant x 2
>
>objectives
>
>sucker run x 4
>king of the hill
>site of power x 3
>amazonian hunt
>the vault
>
>
>and there it is... this deck really kicks ass with some of the corp
>war cards but of course i can't add those...don't want to end up in
>the people's court...so they weren't included and the cards i >removed
for those cards, i put back..
>
>i welcome all comments
>
>brak
>
>mind over matter = if you don't mind, why should it matter???

Having a simular style of lockdown deck, it looks like a very effective
decker deck. Due to the lack of direct runner conflict (minor flaw in
the game IMO) I can see how this deck kicks butt. I would think that it
would have problems against decks that attempt runner vs. runner combat
or that imploy direct damage cards ... Ie shurikin/drive-bys/ or Z-zone.
But those are the breaks (how I know them well).

*** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
*** - Tao ***

Jayden Stormwalker
Donald Arganbright

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

From:	Gabriel Rosario <grosario@**.HARRAHS.COM>
Subject:	Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 1999 00:00:22 -0600

Message no. 10 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01BE53F0.A911E4F2
Content-Type: text/plain

I would think that it
would have problems against decks that attempt runner vs. runner combat
or that imploy direct damage cards ... Ie shurikin/drive-bys/ or Z-zone.
But those are the breaks (how I know them well).

once i lock a deck down i don't worry about wanted and direct
combat..and even if they do i make them pay with bad rep..sure kill
static for 1 rep but you're gonna lose 9 rep...and with the ice queen's
and sticky fingers..my opponent doesn't usually have the means of
bringing out their big guns..remember playing ccg's is 60% luck and 40%
skill...i truly believe that even if you get a bad draw a skilled and
quick thinking player can get out of a real sticky situation.

brak

like always.i welcome all comments..

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Arganbright [SMTP:jayden63@*******.COM]
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 1999 9:02 AM
> To: SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET
> Subject: Re: [Admin] No Attachments!
>
> Hoi,
>
> >okay okay...here it is..but first things first this deck has
> >lost..not
> much but it has lost...
> >
> >
> >BRAK'S MOTHER MAY I DECK
> >
> >
> >runners
> >
> >static x 4
> >thrash x 3
> >ice queen x 3
> >jade x 4
> >dodger
> >the mole
> >
> >locations
> >
> >fuchi x 4
> >aztechnology
> >saeder-krupp
> >
> >gear
> >
> >lucky wabbits foot
> >fuchi cyber-6 x 2
> >sticky fingers x 2
> >
> >specials
> >
> >deja vu x 3
> >bad rep x 3
> >loaded dice x 4
> >loti x 4
> >stand aside x 2
> >moonlighting x 2
> >gaq x 4
> >whoops! x 3
> >wild goose chase x 2
> >bad lunch
> >cowards
> >false mentor
> >
> >challenges
> >
> >booby trap x 4
> >sabotaged controls
> >corpselight
> >chomps x 2
> >incubus x 3
> >double jeopardy x 2
> >hellish traffic x 4
> >fusion gate
> >maglocks x 2
> >security consultant x 2
> >
> >objectives
> >
> >sucker run x 4
> >king of the hill
> >site of power x 3
> >amazonian hunt
> >the vault
> >
> >
> >and there it is... this deck really kicks ass with some of the corp
> >war cards but of course i can't add those...don't want to end up in
> >the people's court...so they weren't included and the cards i
> >removed
> for those cards, i put back..
> >
> >i welcome all comments
> >
> >brak
> >
> >mind over matter = if you don't mind, why should it matter???
>
> Having a simular style of lockdown deck, it looks like a very
> effective
> decker deck. Due to the lack of direct runner conflict (minor flaw in
> the game IMO) I can see how this deck kicks butt. I would think that
> it
> would have problems against decks that attempt runner vs. runner
> combat
> or that imploy direct damage cards ... Ie shurikin/drive-bys/ or
> Z-zone.
> But those are the breaks (how I know them well).
>
> *** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
> *** - Tao ***
>
> Jayden Stormwalker
> Donald Arganbright
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

------_=_NextPart_001_01BE53F0.A911E4F2
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; =
charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>RE: [Admin] No Attachments!</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

I would think that
it
 would have problems against
decks =
that attempt runner vs. runner combat
 or that imploy direct damage
cards =
... Ie shurikin/drive-bys/ or Z-zone.
 But those are the breaks
(how I know =
them well).


once i lock a deck =
down i don't worry about wanted and direct combat..and even if they do =
i make them pay with bad rep..sure kill static for 1 rep but you're =
gonna lose 9 rep...and with the ice queen's and sticky fingers..my =
opponent doesn't usually have the means of bringing out their big =
guns..remember playing ccg's is 60% luck and 40% skill...i truly =
believe that even if you get a bad draw a skilled and quick thinking =
player can get out of a real sticky situation.

brak


like always.i =
welcome all comments..

<UL>
-----Original
Message-----
 From:   Donald Arganbright =
[SMTP:jayden63@*******.COM]
 Sent:   Monday, February 08, 1999 9:02 AM
 To:    
SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET
 Subject:       =
 Re: [Admin] No
Attachments!


Hoi,


>okay okay...here it
is..but first =
things first this deck has >lost..not
 much but it has
lost...
 >
 >
 >BRAK'S MOTHER MAY I
DECK
 >
 >
 >runners
 >
 >static x
4
 >thrash x
3
 >ice queen x
3
 >jade x
4
 >dodger
 >the
mole
 >
 >locations
 >
 >fuchi x
4
 >aztechnology
 >saeder-krupp
 >
 >gear
 >
 >lucky wabbits
foot
 >fuchi cyber-6 x
2
 >sticky fingers x
2
 >
 >specials
 >
 >deja vu x
3
 >bad rep x
3
 >loaded dice x
4
 >loti x
4
 >stand aside x
2
 >moonlighting x
2
 >gaq x 4
 >whoops! x
3
 >wild goose chase x
2
 >bad
lunch
 >cowards
 >false
mentor
 >
 >challenges
 >
 >booby trap x
4
 >sabotaged
controls
 >corpselight
 >chomps x
2
 >incubus x
3
 >double jeopardy x
2
 >hellish traffic x
4
 >fusion
gate
 >maglocks x
2
 >security consultant
x 2
 >
 >objectives
 >
 >sucker run x
4
 >king of the
hill
 >site of power x
3
 >amazonian
hunt
 >the
vault
 >
 >
 >and there it is...
this deck =
really kicks ass with some of the corp
 >war cards but of
course i can't =
add those...don't want to end up in
 >the people's
court...so they =
weren't included and the cards i >removed
 for those cards, i put
back..
 >
 >i welcome all
comments
 >
 >brak
 >
 >mind over
matter  = if you =
don't mind, why should it matter???


Having a simular style of
lockdown =
deck, it looks like a very effective
 decker deck.  Due
to the lack of =
direct runner conflict (minor flaw in
 the game IMO) I can see how
this deck =
kicks butt.  I would think that it
 would have problems against
decks =
that attempt runner vs. runner combat
 or that imploy direct damage
cards =
... Ie shurikin/drive-bys/ or Z-zone.
 But those are the breaks
(how I know =
them well).


***    Knife Sharpens =
on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man     ***
 ***    - =
Tao           &nb=
sp;           &nb=
sp;           &nb=
sp;         
***


Jayden
Stormwalker
 Donald
Arganbright

 

______________________________________________________</F=
ONT>
 Get Your Private, Free Email
=
at <A =
HREF="http://www.hotmail.com"; =
TARGET="_blank">http://www.hotmail.com</A>;

</UL>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01BE53F0.A911E4F2--

Mailing List Logs for

Further Reading

Disclaimer