Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Brian & Sherry Carty <silver@*****.NET>
Subject: Collection up for grabs
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 17:55:14 -0400
If this goes against maillist policy, apologies in advance. My usenet
reader is acting up, so I'm posting this here.
Message no. 2
From: Brian & Sherry Carty <silver@*****.NET>
Subject: Collection up for grabs
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 17:57:42 -0400
If this goes against maillist policy, apologies in advance. My usenet
reader is acting up, so I'm posting this here.

I have about 1.5 boxes of 1st Ed SRCCG, a few packs of Underworld, and
enough promos to choke a horse (over 10 each of Nerps! and Foxy Roxy,
2-3 Fuchi Industries, 5-6 Adam Bombs, 2-3 Hatchetman 2057s, 3-4 Maglock
Passkeys, and 1 Flatline)

I'm considering selling the lot. If you're interested, let me know what
you'd be willing to offer. Right now the cards are boxed up along with
several other CCGs I no longer play, so I don't have a list of exactly
what I have (I do remember one Skwaaark..no Torgos). (Actually, I never
got a chance to really play the game...I couldn't convince anyone in the
area to invest in another CCG, so the cards have been sitting in a box
for quite some time.

If you're interested in singles, send me a list of what you're
interested in and what you'd give for it. I'll let you know if I have it
and what price I'd like for it.

Thanks,
Brian
Message no. 3
From: "(Ryan Smith)" <SnakeIzBac@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Collection up for grabs
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 17:56:48 EDT
In a message dated 8/20/98 5:54:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time, silver@*****.NET
writes:

<<
If this goes against maillist policy, apologies in advance. My usenet
reader is acting up, so I'm posting this here.
>>


Posting what here?

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Collection up for grabs, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!