Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Sorrow <sorrow@*******.ORG>
Subject: [Deck 2/4] Sleaze Deck
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 19:17:16 -0500
This deck is supposed to do 1 thing:
Sleaze challenges. It's been a bit slow
in building, I've found. I need some way
to speed things up.

Runners:
Macabre x2
Foxy Roxy x2
The Mole x2
Ice Queen x2
Static x2
Thrash x2
Glitz
Marek
Highbrow
Ajax
Hawkwind
Uncle Joe
Sam the Sleuth
Fastjack
Tinkerbell

Gear:
Armor Spell x2
Heal Spell x2
Katana x3
Muscle Replacement // Body, Attack & Athletics
Dermal Plating
Skillsoft: Demolitions // For Uncle Joe
Steamroller
Sleaze x2
Browse x2
Sticky Fingers x2
Crash
Fairlight Excalibur // For the Mole. Use with Fuchi.

Contacts/Locations:
Mr. Johnson x2
Decker Coffeehouse
Fuchi Industries
The Iron Lung

Specials:
Deja Vu x2
Loaded Dice
The Skills to pay the Bills

Challenges:
Double Jeopardy x2
Maglocks x2
Booby Trap x2
Ambushed En Route
Hellhound
Fusion Gate
Integrated Control Center
Lone Star Patrol
Mage Strike Force
Hunting Gargoyle x2
Killer Drone
Elite Security Guards
Heavy Sentry Gun
Widow's Trap
Security Consultant
Manticore
Highway Showdown

Objectives:
Robo-Plant Revolt
Shadowplay
Harlequin's Game
Ragnarock
Steal Wiz Softs x2

Thoughts/Comments?
Anything on how I can speed it up?

Sorrow
---
I don't want to be alone | I hurt, therefore I am
anymore |--------------------------------
I don't want to be anyone | "What are you looking at...?
anymore | you never seen anyone try to
I don't need a reason to kill myself | commit suicide before?" - Anon
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [Deck 2/4] Sleaze Deck, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.