Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: FASA answers on Melee Weapons and Drones
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:01:34 -0700
Boy, Jim and Skuzzy are on a roll today. I believe this is the 5th
response I've gotten from the today:

**********

---FASACorp2@***.com wrote:

Q. A Rigger with Piloting 2 has activated two of his three drones. One
of these drones is trashed. With only one drone now active, may he
activate his other remaining drone?

A. No. During the course of a shadowrun, he can only use a number of
drones equal to hids Piloting skill.

Q. Are hand-to-hand weapons considered Silenced Weapons?

A. No.

**********

===
@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr

"You're calling me Bitch like it's a bad thing."
--> CrapGame during the Drive in the Country tournament

_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com
Message no. 2
From: Forrest <eness@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: FASA answers on Melee Weapons and Drones
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:10:57 -0700
---Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM> wrote:
>
> Boy, Jim and Skuzzy are on a roll today. I believe this is the 5th
> response I've gotten from the today:
>

I guess they just don't like me ;-) I haven't gotten a response out of
them yet from questions last week :(

[snip]

> Q. Are hand-to-hand weapons considered Silenced Weapons?
>
> A. No.
>

damn! $#!* :-)

It's Happy Hour, so I'm outta here :-)
Enjoy!
F

_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com
Message no. 3
From: Neil Fathulla <fathullan@*******.COM.AU>
Subject: Re: FASA answers on Melee Weapons and Drones
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 17:55:51 +1000
Is it just me or does this answer contradict itself. Are they saying YES=
you
can activate another drone since Piloting=2 or No once activated at the s=
tart
of your run than that is your allotment?


Regards
Neil



MIME:daddyjim @ ROCKETMAIL.COM
15/09/97 11:52
To: -:SRCARD @ LISTPROC.ITRIBE.NET@********
cc: (bcc: Neil Fathulla/CEGELEC)
Subject: FASA answers on Melee Weapons and Drones

Boy, Jim and Skuzzy are on a roll today. I believe this is the 5th
response I've gotten from the today:

**********

---FASACorp2@***.com wrote:

Q. A Rigger with Piloting 2 has activated two of his three drones. One
of these drones is trashed. With only one drone now active, may he
activate his other remaining drone?

A. No. During the course of a shadowrun, he can only use a number of
drones equal to hids Piloting skill.
Message no. 4
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: FASA answers on Melee Weapons and Drones
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 01:30:11 -0700
---Neil Fathulla wrote:
>
> Is it just me or does this answer contradict itself. Are they
saying YES you
> can activate another drone since Piloting=2 or No once activated at
the start
> of your run than that is your allotment?

The answer is best thought of this way - over the course of a
Shadowrun a Rigger/Shaman may have only used a max number of
Drones/Spirits equal to their Piloting/Conjuring.

===
@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr

"You're calling me Bitch like it's a bad thing."
--> CrapGame during the Drive in the Country tournament
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about FASA answers on Melee Weapons and Drones, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!