Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Ken Dirk (DrugDoc)" <dirkkenn@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: [FASA] Official tourney rules--Anti-Social
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 11:44:19 -0800
Just my 2 cents worth,

Am I reading this right, that all the nuyen, runners, etc. is only
applied IF there is a tie?

Also, IMHO I don't think that "anti-social" should be given points. It
is set up as a disadvantage on cards to balance out the lower nuyen cost
(sometimes) to bring a bigger guy out.

Of course, if FASA still wants to keep "anti-social" as an advantage,
perhaps a new objective could be made allowing a 2 Nuyen gain for every
runner present with anti-social. Could name it something like "anti's
social".....(I'll now hide from any flaming due to the last pun) :-)

Ken Dirk (DrugDoc)
Message no. 2
From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: [FASA] Official tourney rules--Anti-Social
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 11:28:03 -0800
> Am I reading this right, that all the nuyen, runners, etc. is only
> applied IF there is a tie?

I haven't actually read the tourney rules yet, so I can't comment on
that.

> Also, IMHO I don't think that "anti-social" should be given points. It
> is set up as a disadvantage on cards to balance out the lower nuyen cost
> (sometimes) to bring a bigger guy out.

I think the nuyen should be given to players who use Anti-social and
Hermit characters, over those with the other special traits. Maybe
(maybe) add Prime to that list. Guard, Stamina and Recon are just too
*nice* as abilities without generating more nuyen to boot.


-Matt

------------------------------------
With nomads I am numbered. -- E. MacColl

SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [FASA] Official tourney rules--Anti-Social, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!