Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Michael/Tamara Pease-Lorenz <treehugr@****.ON.ROGERS.WAVE.CA>
Subject: FASA Ruling on FastJack
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 11:39:19 -0500
Received: from golden.net ([199.166.210.183]) by mail.on.rogers.wave.ca with ESMTP id
<325191-8787>; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 07:40:38 -0500
Received: from falcon (cisco7-148.cas.golden.net [207.216.76.148]) by golden.net
(8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA22510 for <treehugr@******.wave.ca>; Sun, 26 Oct
1997 07:40:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199710261240.HAA22510@******.net>
From: "Stephen Garstin" <sgarstin@******.net>
To: "Michael and Tamara Pease" <treehugr@******.wave.ca>
Subject: Fw: FastJack
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 07:40:35 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



----------
> From: FASACorp2@***.com
> To: sgarstin@******.net
> Subject: Re: FastJack
> Date: Saturday, October 25, 1997 5:54 PM
>
>
> In a message dated 10/25/97 12:47:58 AM, you wrote:
>
>> I probably haven't looked hard enough to determine this, but if
FastJack
>> pays his ability to look at, and decide the order of, all the challenges
on
>> an objective, does that automatically mean he is taking part in the
>> ShadowRun, and counts as a Runner?

> No.

>> Would this also apply if he did that for another player while they are
on
>> THEIR ShadowRun? So that you could force them to only be able to use
five
>> runners, and allow you to preview all the challenges they may face, and
>> decide the order on behalf of the normal owner of the objective?

> No. He could use his ability but he wouldn't count as a part of the
'running
> team. Also, the other player would then choose whih order to face the
> Challenges in.

>> Is this a stupid question?>>

> Absolutely not!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about FASA Ruling on FastJack, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.