Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Steven A. Tinner" <bluewizard@*****.COM>
Subject: Foxy Roxy!
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 01:19:48 -0400
Holy crow is this a goo card!
Social - 4 and she automatically sleazes all Personnel Challenges!
Now I just need to know ... is it just her that sleazes them, or does the
whole team get to go with her?

She may only be a 1/1, but she costs just four nuyen!
I think I found someone to help my skill-less trogs!

Steven A. Tinner
bluewizard@*****.com
http://www.ncweb.com/users/bluewizard
"Until you find something worth dying for, you're not really living"
Message no. 2
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Foxy Roxy!
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 22:44:26 -0700
---"Steven A. Tinner" wrote:
>
> Holy crow is this a good card!
> Social - 4 and she automatically sleazes all Personnel Challenges!
> Now I just need to know ... is it just her that sleazes them, or
does the
> whole team get to go with her?

Foxy Roxy
Type: Runner
Rarity: Promo
Description: Legendary Elf Flirt
Notes: 4¥. Social-4. 1/1. Foxy Roxy automatically sleazes any
personnel challenge.

I believe it would be like the Sleep spell or Maglock passkey on
someone on your team. Foxy Roxy just automatically meets any Sleaze
requirement on a personnel challenge and gets your team through it.
She's a Legendary Flirt... a little cleavage, a flash of thigh and
Lone Star doesn't notice the three trolls skulking across the street.

She's a 1/1 though, you'd best get some armor on her quick or Riots,
Drive-By and Tempest challenges like Hit & Run could be a nitemare.
Lord Torgo will also find her a elven play-toy. ;o)

===
@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr

"You're calling me Bitch like it's a bad thing."
--> CrapGame during the Drive in the Country tournament



_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com
Message no. 3
From: Cyclops250 <Cyclops250@***.COM>
Subject: Foxy Roxy
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 14:29:23 EST
Does Foxy Roxy's ability override the effects of the anti-social attribute?
Later,
Joshua Hoade
cyclops250@***.com


"Follow your dreams, you can reach your goals, I'm living proof. Beefcake,
BEEFCAKE!!!" - Eric Cartman

"So you see, Simon and Simon were not brothers in real life, only on
television." - Eric Cartman
Message no. 4
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Foxy Roxy
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 11:52:52 -0800
---Cyclops250 <Cyclops250@***.COM> wrote:
>
> Does Foxy Roxy's ability override the effects of the anti-social
attribute?

<plug>
This and similar questions are covered in the SRTCG Q&A: SRCard's
Official Unofficial SRTCG FAQ hosted at Tony's site:
http://members.home.net/porthos/srtcg/srtcg.html
</plug>

Here's the entry:

Q1: If Foxy Roxy and GoreTusk are together on a run when they hit
Security Guards, which takes precedence: Foxy's ability to
auto-sleaze, or Gore Tusk's triggering the alarm via anti-social?

A1: If "Foxy Roxy" is present on a Shadowrun with another Runner that
is 'Anti-social' and they encounter a personnel Challenge you have to
roll off with a D6 to see who takes precedence. Sorry there is no hard
and fast ruling for this one. This question was one of the first that
came up early on in the playtesting.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 3/29/98


_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Foxy Roxy, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!