Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Misc. Questions (was Re: Decker deck ideas)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 14:42:48 -0700
---Forrest Houston wrote:
>
> Finally, I have a few questions (apologies if these have been covered
> somewhere):

Hey, it's what the list is for isn't it? ;o)

> - Is pulling a team out of a run an "all or nothing" thing (not the
> card...)? What I mean is, can I pull just one or two runners out,
or do
> they all have leave?

Everyone goes, or everyone stays. There are however, cards that chage
this like GAQS, Invisibility or the Yamaha Rapier.

> - Are melee weapons considered "silent"?

Only if the card specifically states so. Check out the Ranger X,
you'll see how Silent Weapon is a gear keyword.

> - Can runners who have been sent back via Invisibility still use
indirect
> weapons?

I wouldn't think so. It's just like having GAQS played on a runner,
they've been turned to go on the run, and have now been taken out of
it. They're not eligible for any other actions. That's the gamble of
using invisiblity. I personally only use the spell to move on from the
last challenge and take the objective, or if recon told me that
whatver's next is something my mage can handle solo.

**BTW, Forrest, you're mailer is somehow overriding the list's
Reply-To field.

===
@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr

"You're calling me Bitch like it's a bad thing."
--> CrapGame during the Drive in the Country tournament
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Misc. Questions (was Re: Decker deck ideas), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.