Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Donald Arganbright <jayden63@*******.COM>
Subject: Names of Prime Runners and Uniques
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 22:47:35 PST
Hi all,

Having just obtained a (hopefully) complete list
of all available cards I have a question. (the list
could have been a little more detailed.)

1 - Which of the runner cards are the Prime Runners?

and

2 - Which of all the cards are the Unique ones?

and finally

3 - Are Prime Runners considered Unique?

(ok so the list could have been a LOT more detailed)

Thanks,


*** In ruling, the Sage attends to the heart, not the eye ***
*** - Tao ***

Jayden Stormwalker


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 2
From: Tony Glinka <porthos@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Names of Prime Runners and Uniques
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:00:01 -0700
Donald Arganbright wrote:

> Having just obtained a (hopefully) complete list
> of all available cards I have a question. (the list
> could have been a little more detailed.)
>
> 1 - Which of the runner cards are the Prime Runners?

Prime Runners: Da Profezzur, Dirk Montgomery, Dodger, Fastjack, Ghost
Who Walks, Jack Skater, Kham, Lord Torgo, Ravage, Sally Tsung, Scatter,
Wheeler, and Hatchetman 2057

> 2 - Which of all the cards are the Unique ones?

Unique: Hatchetman 2057, Nerps!, Guardian Dracofrom, Guardian Earth
Elemental, Guardian Fire Elemental, False Mentor

> 3 - Are Prime Runners considered Unique?

Nope. The only one who is both is Hatchetman 2057.

And if I missed any people, please correct me.

Tony
--
GridSec: SRCard
Porthos@**.netcom.com
Porthos' World of Shadowrun: http://porthos.base.org/sr.html
Tony's SRTCG Site: http://porthos.base.org/srtcg.html

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Names of Prime Runners and Uniques, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!