Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Numer of Objectives
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:55:51 -0400
Ok, we know that there must be at least 6 objectives in a deck, but are
tehre any limits to how many of each objective you put in? Could I use 4
Up and Over's and 2 Critter hunts as my 6? Or do you need to mix them up
more. personally, I like to mix and match, but it's more effective to max
out the really good objectives... makes the deck easier to fine tune and
streamline...

Bull
--
Bull, aka Steven Ratkovich, aka Rak, aka a lot of others! :]

The Offical Celebrity Shadowrn Mailing List Welcome Ork Decker!
Fearless Leader of the Star Wars Mailing List
List Flunky of ShadowCreations, creators of the Newbies Guide,
in production now!
HOME PAGE: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cavern/3604/home.html

"Whoever invented solataire is one sadistic son of a bitch"
-- Me, after spending 2 hours trying to win a game
Message no. 2
From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Numer of Objectives
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 08:24:11 -0700
> Ok, we know that there must be at least 6 objectives in a deck, but are
> tehre any limits to how many of each objective you put in? Could I use 4
> Up and Over's and 2 Critter hunts as my 6? Or do you need to mix them up
> more. personally, I like to mix and match, but it's more effective to max
> out the really good objectives... makes the deck easier to fine tune and
> streamline...

I think the official state is that you can have as many Objectives as
you want, but at least six and no more than four of each objective; and,
however few or many Objectives you have, the total Reputation value has
to exceed the "win" amount for the game.

> Bull

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Numer of Objectives, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!